Información de la revista
Vol. 105. Núm. 4.
Páginas 347-358 (Mayo 2014)
Vol. 105. Núm. 4.
Páginas 347-358 (Mayo 2014)
Acceso a texto completo
Arteriovenous Malformations: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge
Malformaciones arteriovenosas: un reto diagnóstico y terapéutico
R. de Miguela,??
Autor para correspondencia

Corresponding author.
, J.C. López-Gutierrezb, P. Boixedac
a Servicio de Dermatología, Trincay Polyclinic, Cayman Islands
b Servicio de Cirugía Pediátrica, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
c Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Descargar PDF
Figuras (8)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Tablas (6)
Table 1. Familial Arteriovenous Malformations.
Table 2. Syndromes Associated With Arteriovenous Malformations.
Table 3. Clinical Presentation.
Table 4. Schöbinger Stages.
Table 5. Differences Between Capillary Malformations and Arteriovenous Malformations.
Table 6. Indications for the Initial Treatment Regimen.
Mostrar másMostrar menos

Many dermatologists are largely unfamiliar with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). This is partly due to the low prevalence of these lesions and to the fact that they are generally managed by other specialists, in particular, interventional radiologists and pediatric, maxillofacial, and plastic surgeons. In this article, we review the recommended nomenclature for AVMs and look at their clinical manifestations and diagnosis, as well as the ideal type and time of treatment. AVMs should be managed from a multidisciplinary approach, and the dermatologist's primary goal should be to make a proper diagnosis and thereby avoid unnecessary treatments.

Vascular malformation
High-flow vascular anomalies

Muchos dermatólogos están muy poco familiarizados con las malformaciones arteriovenosas (MAV). Ello es debido, en parte, a la baja prevalencia de dichas lesiones y al hecho de que generalmente suelen ser tratadas por médicos de otras especialidades, en particular radiólogos intervencionistas de adultos y pediátricos, médicos maxilofaciales y cirujanos plásticos. En este artículo revisamos la nomenclatura recomendada para las MAV y nos centramos en sus manifestaciones clínicas y en su diagnóstico, así como en el tipo ideal y el tiempo de tratamiento. El manejo de las MAV debe hacerse desde una aproximación multidisciplinar, siendo el objetivo principal de los dermatólogos realizar un correcto diagnóstico para evitar, de este modo, tratamientos innecesarios.

Palabras clave:
Malformación vascular
Anomalías vasculares de alto flujo
Texto completo

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are high-flow vascular anomalies due to a failure of embryogenesis. They involve a direct communication between an artery and a vein with no intervening capillary bed.1


AVMs represent only 10% to 15% of vascular malformations, but we must ask ourselves whether the nomenclature is being used correctly.

Is the Nomenclature Used Correctly?

In the past, terms such as salmon patch, strawberry hemangioma, port wine stain, and angioma were often used indistinctly in the nomenclature of vascular malformations and tumors, with no differentiation of the clinical, histopathological, and therapeutic aspects, despite their distinct etiologies and pathogenesis.

It was only in 1982 that Mulliken and Glowacki2 developed a classification by uniting the histological structure and appearance of the predominant endothelium with the biological behavior of the vascular anomalies.

That classification was redefined by Mulliken and Young in 1996 and adopted by the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA). In the new classification, vascular malformations were defined by their predominant component, separating the lesions into malformations and tumors. Malformations were subdivided into low and high flow. This system is today considered to be the reference classification.3

In the 1988 Hamburg classification, vascular malformations were defined according to the predominant vascular lesion (arterial, venous, arteriovenous shunt, or combined/mixed) and were divided into truncular or extratruncular depending on whether or not major axial vessels were involved.

However, in a recent review of articles cited in PubMed in 2009, Hassanein and Mulliken4 drew attention to the fact that the term hemangioma was used erroneously in 71.3% of cases, demonstrating that nomenclature is still a significant problem and that it can lead to confusion when prescribing treatment (such as propranolol, for example), which may not be indicated. Genetic tests and diagnostic investigations based on the molecular biology of the lesion, flow rate, and response to pharmacological treatments will be taken into account in the classification of AVMs in the near future.


The most widely accepted theory of the etiology and pathogenesis of AVMs postulates that these lesions are due to an increase in the number of vessels caused by a defect in vascular development, particularly angiogenesis.5 The most common site of AVMs is the brain and it is here that they have been most extensively studied. Although we do not know if findings from the study of cerebral AVMs can be extrapolated to extracranial AVMs, a number of angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor, do appear to be implicated. It has been suggested that this is the cause of the dynamic vascular disturbance present in AVMs, producing an early alteration of angiogenesis, in contrast to what occurs in venous malformations; this is supported by the increase in the serum level of metalloproteinases detected in cases of AVM. The STAT proteins (signal transducers and activators of transcription) are also involved in the pathophysiology of angiogenesis in AVMs. A group of these proteins, specifically the STAT 3 proteins, is most active in the fetal period and may play a significant role in angiogenesis. Thorough knowledge of this process will help us to develop a more specific and appropriate treatment in each situation in the future.

A great deal of research still remains to be done on the genetic importance of these disorders and their triggering factors.

Do Triggering Factors Exist?

Yes, triggering factors have been identified. The known factors include hormonal changes (adolescence, pregnancy), infections, trauma, and surgical procedures. Infection is the factor most frequently implicated in the acquired acral AVMs.

Despite these identified factors, many AVMs remain in a quiescent phase throughout their life while others progress rapidly; this has also been seen with malignant tumors, in which some tumors disseminate rapidly while others of similar origin and stage remain stable. These 2 situations can be explained by the Knudson concept,6 in which incomplete penetrance of the affected genes leads to marked variability in clinical expression.

For Buckmilller et al.,7 however, AVMs behave as true slow-growing tumors, based on the demonstrated presence of cell turnover, which does not exist in venous, capillary, or lymphatic malformations.

Have Advances Been Made in Genetics?

The majority of AVMs are sporadic, with no genetic defects detected. Genetic alterations have been identified in some forms of familial AVM (Table 1),8 including hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome),9 attributed to a mutation of endoglin (ENG),10and the activin receptor-like kinase-1 gene (ALK-1),11,12 which affects transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) signaling. Mutations have also been detected in ACVRLK1 and SMADH4. In capillary malformation-AVM syndrome there is a mutation in the RASA1 gene13 on chromosome 5q 13–22, whose dysfunction produces an alteration of the Ras signaling pathway (due to an alteration of protein p120 RasGAP).

Table 1.

Familial Arteriovenous Malformations.

Malformation  Clinical Presentation  Locus  Gene 
HHT  Epistaxis  9q 33-34  ENG 
  Telangiectasias  12q 11-14  ACVRL1 
  AVM (lung, 30%-50%; liver, 40%; GI, 30%; brain, 5%-20%)5q  SMAD4 
CM-AVM  30% of AVMs, AVF, Parkes-Weber syndromeMultiple smaller lesions with a whitish halo  5q 13-22  RASA1 

Abbreviations: AVF, arteriovenous fistula; CM-AVM: capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation; GI, gastrointestinal; HHT: hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

There are many forms of syndromic AVM (Table 2), as is the case for patients with mutations of the PTEN gene (Cowden, Proteus, and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndromes), who also develop arteriovenous anomalies.14–16 Other syndromes associated with AVMs include Cobb syndrome (vertebral and spinal cord AVMs with metameric cutaneous capillary involvement), Parkes-Weber syndrome (generalized hypertrophy of a limb associated with an AVM and a capillary malformation [CM]), Bonnet-Dechaume-White syndrome (metameric cerebral AVM that extends from the craniofacial region to the orbit), and Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome17 (young patients with unilateral lower-limb lesions with an underlying AVM).

Table 2.

Syndromes Associated With Arteriovenous Malformations.

Bonnet-Dechaume-White syndrome: Retinal or choroidal AVM 
Wyburn-Mason syndrome: neurological symptoms and mental alterations 
Brégeat syndrome: AVM of the conjunctiva, cheeks, nose, and mouth 
Cobb's syndrome: AVM of the spinal cord and of the same metamere 
Parkes-Weber syndrome: AVM of a limb 
Rendu-Osler-Weber syndrome 
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia 
Cowden syndrome 
Epithelioid hemangioma 
Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome 
Diffuse dermal angiomatosis 
Lhermitte-Duclos syndrome 
Acroangiodermatitis of Mali 
Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia 
Reactive angioendotheliomatosis 
Angiokeratoma corporis diffusum without Fabry disease 
Capillary malformations: changes in the RASA1 gene 
Multiple cutaneous follicular hamartoma 
Multiple glomus tumors 
Facial hemangiomas 
Aplasia cutis congenita 
Sebaceous nevus syndrome 
Posterior fossa malformations–hemangiomas–arterial anomalies–cardiac defects–eye abnormalities–sternal cleft and supraumbilical raphe (PHACE) syndrome 
Clinical Manifestations

The clinical presentation of AVMs can be varied (Table 3).18 In their early stages they are difficult to differentiate from other conditions such as port wine stain.

Table 3.

Clinical Presentation.

Red/pink macule 
Bluish/violaceous mass 
Several small lesions, often with a whitish halo (in CM-AVM) 
Dilated veins (sometimes with a thrill) or skin vibration 
Pulsatile lesions 
Nodular lesion arising on a macule 
Diffuse hypertrophy with increase in the size of the affected limb (Parkes-Weber syndrome) 
Skin changes of Kaposi pseudosarcoma (Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome) 
Lytic bone lesions 
Heart failure with multiple AVFs 

We should not therefore be surprised by the number of errors in the past, when noninvoluting congenital hemangiomas were erroneously diagnosed as AVMs.

AVMs are lesions present at birth and visible at that moment in 60% of cases; 20% to 30% become evident during adolescence and 10% to 20% in adult life. They are most commonly situated on the head and neck (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Ateriovenous malformations. Lesions can progress rapidly at birth or appear later.


AVMs will not disappear as hemangiomas do, but instead they grow slowly or start to grow after a trigger (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Ateriovenous malformations. Clinical presentation can be very variable, leading to diagnostic difficulty on physical examination.


When associated with other malformations, AVMs can affect the underlying tissue or cause bone hypertrophy.19

They are usually considered to be pulsatile lesions.

Are All Lesions Pulsatile?

No, not all AVMs are pulsatile. A thrill is highly characteristic but is not present in all cases, such as very early lesions, lesions with only a minimal shunt and those in which the arterial and venous hypertrophy secondary to the communication between the two systems is greater on the venous side.

Do Lesions Behave Differently According to Whether They Are Diagnosed Before 20 Years of Age or After 40 Years of Age?

It is not known why some AVMs remain asymptomatic until adult life while others produce symptoms during early adolescence.20

Children who present an exacerbation of an AVM at an early age will have a poorer prognosis, with a greater number of surgical procedures, greater morbidity, and more sequelae compared with adult patients in whom changes develop during their fifth decade of life.

Lesions diagnosed after 40 years of age may sometimes be acquired, particularly after trauma, as may occur in acral regions (Fig. 3).21 These appear to be reactive lesions and they are not influenced by the hormonal changes that affect lesions diagnosed early in life.

Figure 3.

Acral ateriovenous malformations. These may arise after trauma.


From a practical point of view, the clinical stage of these malformations is defined according to the Schöbinger classification (Fig. 4 and Table 4).

Figure 4.

Schöbinger stages.

Table 4.

Schöbinger Stages.

Stage I or quiescent  Pink-violaceous macule with the presence of an arteriovenous shunt that can be detected on Doppler ultrasound. Typically asymptomatic. Present from soon after birth until adolescence 
Stage II or expansive  Same as the previous stage but pulsatile with clinical evidence of tense tortuous vessels at puberty 
Stage III or destructive  Dystrophic skin changes, ulceration, bleeding, and continuous pain, possibly even with necrosis and lytic bone lesions 
Stage IV or decompensated  Heart failure 

In patients under 20 years of age, the lesions are vascular anomalies (the majority wrongly diagnosed as hemangiomas) that start to grow and bleed, particularly at puberty or with hormonal changes.

Patients over 40 years of age have been unaware of any previous lesion and they give a history of recent onset. Patients typically report the appearance of lesions after trauma.

When the pinna of the ear is affected, an AVM can also usually be found on the scalp and on the neck.

Progression of the lesions is evident as an increase in the communication, giving rise to arterial steal and venous hypertension, with a reduction in tissue perfusion. The manifestations of this tissue ischemia include pain, ulceration, and bleeding.


Bleeding occurs in 3% to 4% per year in patients between 10 and 55 years of age, and can lead to death in 1% of cases.

When a patient has bled, the risk of rebleed in the first year is approximately 20% if no treatment is performed.

However, it is rare for a high-flow AVM/AV fistula present since birth to be a threat to the life of a child due to cardiac overload (with the exception of intracranial lesions).

Should an AVM Be Considered Whenever a Nodule Develops on a Capillary Malformation?

If a pyogenic granuloma appears over what is assumed to be a capillary malformation, we should consider the possible presence of an AVM.

This issue has been discussed in a number of recent articles. One of them involved 31 patients with capillary malformations on which nodules appeared.22 Histological analysis of those lesions revealed that 45.1% were pyogenic granulomas, 32.3% were AVMs (Fig. 5), the 2 types of lesion (pyogenic granuloma and AVM) coexisted in 16%, and cavernous-like vascular ectasia was present in 6.5%. These lesions appeared most commonly in the territory innervated by the second branch of the trigeminal nerve.

Figure 5.

Nodular lesion of recent appearance on a capillary malformation. Arteriovenous malformation.


In some studies it has been postulated that the characteristic pathogenesis and clinical course of pyogenic granulomas on capillary malformations are observed because the lesions are actually AVMs.23 These nodules are typically solitary, but there are reports of multiple grouped pyogenic granulomas in which histology and Doppler ultrasound suggest the presence of an underlying AVM.24


The medical history and physical examination are diagnostic in 90% of cases. Greatest diagnostic difficulty occurs in the first months of life when investigating a congenital macule of pink color.

Is it a CM or an AVM? (Table 5)

In neonates, hemangiomas must be included in the differential diagnosis, particularly in very early phases of the lesion.25

Table 5.

Differences Between Capillary Malformations and Arteriovenous Malformations.

Capillary Malformations  Arteriovenous Malformations 
Present at birth  Present at birth 
Slow growth  Sudden initiation of growth: triggers (hormones, infections, trauma, unknown) 
Do not involute  Do not involute 
Sex ratio 1:1  Sex ratio 1:1 
Nonpulsatile  Pulsatile, though not always 
Changes in color and thickness  Color does not change 
Histopathology: increase in the number and size of capillaries. Error of embryogenesis  Histopathology: no vascular bed. Error of embryogenesis 
WT1-, GLUT1-  WT1+, GLUT1- 
RASA1 (capillary malformation-AVM)  ENG (Rendu-Osler-Weber)ALKRASA1 (CM-AVM)PTEN (syndromes)VEGFR 
Doppler ultrasound: low flow  Doppler ultrasound: high flow 
Cosmetic treatment  Treatment for ulceration, bleeding, deformity 

Abbreviations: AVM, arteriovenous malformation; CM, capillary malformation.

The clinical manifestations and even the usual diagnostic tests cannot differentiate between the 2 entities at such an early age; it is the clinical course of the lesions that gives us the definitive diagnosis in the majority of cases. This difficulty should soon be resolved thanks to the latest advances in immunohistochemistry26 with the Wilms Tumor 1 (WT1) marker.27,28 WT1 is positive in vascular neoplasms and in AVMs and negative in venous and capillary malformations. As a confounding factor, 30% of AVMs associated with capillary malformations (CM-AVMs) present a mutation in RASA1,29–31 and positivity for this mutation will not therefore differentiate the lesions.

Diagnostic tests (Fig. 6)Are Diagnostic Tests Necessary?32

Firmness on palpation, rapid filling after emptying the lesion by pressure, and a palpable pulse (if present) will make us suspect the diagnosis.

In those cases in which the diagnosis is unclear in the neonatal period, the key to diagnosis is the clinical course of the lesion: hemangiomas increase rapidly in size whereas AVMs do not show such early changes.33

Figure 6.

Diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm for arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

What Diagnostic Tests Should Be Requested and When?

The request for diagnostic tests depends on the age of the patient, the area affected, and the Schöbinger stage.34

Doppler ultrasound is used for the initial investigation as it is a noninvasive test that differentiates easily between AVMs and venous and lymphatic malformations.35 In addition to anatomical information, this study provides hemodynamic data by measuring vascular flow. In AVMs, Doppler ultrasound reveals the arterial and venous pulse waves (large feeding artery and equally large and pulsatile draining veins) with abundant turbulent flow at moderate-to-high speed. Doppler ultrasound will better characterize a small vascular lesion, and will provide information that will help us to exclude lymphatic, venous, and mixed lesions.

In cases of small atypical lesions with low flow in newborn patients, it is essential for the radiologist to have experience in Doppler ultrasound studies and the use of transducers of up to 20MHz.

AVMs, like venous malformations, are not visible on x-rays, but they do have effects on adjacent bone structures (lytic lesions, asymmetric hypertrophy or atrophy, etc.).36

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) weighted in T1 and T2 continues to be the main diagnostic test for the study of vascular malformations.37 This investigation is performed after confirming the diagnosis on Doppler ultrasound and its advantages include an absence of ionizing radiation, images in various planes, and hemodynamic information; it can thus also be used as a follow-up study. But MRI is often insufficient to identify the afferent and efferent vessels, nests, and flows. This requires computed tomography (CT) angiography.

CT is a technique that usually requires contrast (with the possible side effects that this entails) and often the patient must be sedated, particularly children. This study also exposes the patient to ionizing radiation.

CT angiography is of great help prior to surgery, as it provides information on the underlying bony structures and on the vascular system. Multisection CT angiography continues to be used when surgery is going to involve a critical area, substituting arteriography, which is only indicated if embolization is to be performed.

Arteriography is thus a therapeutic procedure (it is performed whenever embolization is to be done, but not as a diagnostic test). When CT angiography and MRI angiography do not provide the information necessary for embolization or surgery, arteriography must be performed. However, this does not usually occur if the interventional radiologist is experienced.

Less invasive tests that have been developed recently to follow up vascular malformations include transarterial lung perfusion scintigraphy (TLPS) and whole body blood pool scintigraphy (WBBPS).

TLPS has the sole function of determining the extent of arteriovenous communication in an AVM in a limb, and is used in preference to angiography in such cases. However, this technique is not available in all hospitals.

WBBPS is very useful to follow-up the progression of deep vascular malformations, particularly when TLPS is not available.

Biopsy is rarely necessary as 99% of AVMs can be diagnosed on the basis of clinical manifestations and Doppler ultrasound studies. It is only performed when there is doubt about differentiation from other tumors or lymphomas, with staining for WT1 in the case of CMs. In the early stages, given the similarities between CMs and AVMs, histopathological characteristics have been described to help differentiate the 2 lesions.25 However, biopsy should be avoided as far as possible due to the risk of bleeding and the possibility of triggering growth of an AVM. Histological information therefore comes from the study of surgical specimens.

Finally, new tests, such as artery spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance, performed with a 3 tesla device, provides flow data and will probably soon become a standard for the study and differentiation of subtypes.


Treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach.38

Treatment or no Treatment, and When to Treat

This will depend on the Schöbinger stage, size, and site of the AVM, the age of the patient, and whether or not the lesion shows progression (Tables 5 and 6).39

Table 6.

Indications for the Initial Treatment Regimen.

Rapid progression to stage II 
Hemorrhage. Stage III 
Heart failure. Stage IV 
Complications secondary to arterial ischemia 
Complications secondary to chronic venous hypertension 
Uncontrollable pain 
Functional disability 
Severe cosmetic deformity 
Vascular bone syndrome 
Visceral involvement (risk of uncontrolled bleeding) 
Conservative Treatment40Non-Invasive Measures

Protection of the area, avoiding injury.

If the patient is taking oral contraceptives, these should only contain progesterone due to the proangiogenic effect of the estrogens.41 However, although pregnancy will theoretically favor AVM expansion, no changes have been reported in stageI lesions.

The compression of lesions in the legs can improve the pain, but may also worsen an AVM because of the associated hypoxia.


The definitive treatment is surgical, which can be total or subtotal depending on the site and size of the lesion; cure can only be achieved by complete surgical excision (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Ateriovenous malformation. Surgical treatment.


Surgeons divide the extracranial sites into 4 areas: head and neck, visceral, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Each area has its specific characteristics that, when considering a surgical approach, will help us evaluate the risks and benefits of a proactive approach.

Subtotal surgical excision, though not curative, can sometimes improve quality of life and delay progression. Subtotal surgical excision must guarantee the removal of at least 70% of the lesion as it could otherwise even be counterproductive.

The most difficult aspect of the management of AVMs is the timing of surgery.

When an AVM is situated in a noncritical area (for example, on an arm, a leg,42 or on the trunk), surgical excision can be performed at any time and is recommended to prevent possible deformities and other problems.43

Surgical excision with free margins is extremely difficult when the AVM is situated in a critical area, such as the face, or in the case of diffuse, poorly delimited lesions or ones that invade neighboring structures. In these cases, the best option, when feasible, is observation; surgical excision would probably be incomplete and there is a risk of recurrence or exacerbation. Should surgery be performed, the primary objectives are symptom relief, the preservation of vital functions, and improvement of deformities. Thanks to the advances in endovascular techniques and the materials now available, surgery can be less aggressive. Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that when an intervention is performed late, it will be more complex and will be less likely to be curative.

Differentiation between normal and pathological vessels can be complicated during surgery and this will make it difficult to determine the limits of the lesion in order to achieve correct surgical resection. In AVMs there is hyperplasia of anomalous vessels around the malformation due to the increased venous return, although the vessels have normal characteristics.

Three of every 4 patients require surgery during childhood or adolescence, and one of every 4 patients during adult life.

In Parkes-Weber syndrome (Fig. 8), surgery is useful to improve quality of life, for example by correcting dysmetria or treating ischemic ulcers.

Figure 8.

Parkes-Weber syndrome: generalized hypertrophy of a limb associated with an arteriovenous malformation.


Embolization is performed 24 to 72hours prior to surgery in order to reduce blood loss. However, some interventional radiologists perform percutaneous transarterial and transvenous embolization simultaneously, as the only treatment, achieving results similar to surgery, particularly in complex sites such as the head and neck44; however, this usually requires several interventions. In contrast, embolization via a single access route in the hands of an inexperienced radiologist can trigger worsening of the lesion. The embolization materials used will depend on the radiologist's preference and whether the intervention is a presurgical embolization, in which temporary occlusive materials can be used, or definitive embolization, in which long-lasting materials are indicated. At the present time, the Onyx Liquid Embolic System, alcohol, cyanoacrylate, and platinum coils are used.45–48 There is general consensus that embolization must be very distal, within the nest itself if possible, and it is also now considered essential to perform simultaneous percutaneous sclerosis of the drainage veins to reduce flow and potentiate the effect of the arterial embolization agent.

The most common complication is ulceration, particularly in superficial lesions.

As patients spend a night in hospital, swelling of the treated area can be detected and intravenous corticosteroids administered for 24hours, followed by a week of oral corticosteroid therapy.

The large majority of recurrences (98%) occur within the first 5 years after embolization. After this period, there is good long-term control.

Other Treatments

Laser treatment of lesions in the skin is, in principle, contraindicated, although experience is limited and the neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser49 may possibly be useful in early acral (stage I) AVMs.50 The pulsed dye laser has been used in combination with photodynamic therapy,51 but results in various vascular alterations,52 including capillary malformations,53–55 have been inconsistent. There is no evidence for the success of treatment with pulsed dye laser in AVMs.

At the present time, venous malformations are the lesions that benefit most from laser treatment with the intravascular diode laser.56 In coming years, this treatment is likely to be broadened to include intra-arterial therapy.

Angiogenesis can explain the arteriovenous expansion,5 and elevated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietin 2, as well as other proangiogenic factors, have been detected in AVMs, making antiangiogenic therapy a new therapeutic target.57 Promising results have also been obtained with metalloproteinase inhibitors; the metalloproteinases are proteolytic enzymes that break down the extracellular matrix.58

There are other treatments in experimental phases,38 in addition to the aforementioned antiangiogenic therapies,59 and although clinical investigations are ongoing with several of them (sirolimus,60–62 marimastat, doxycycline,63 and thalidomide64) none is as yet officially included in treatment protocols or formally supported by the ISSVA. Sirolimus is contraindicated in AVMs over which the skin has broken down as it exacerbates the ulceration. In recent publications, recognized experts have stated that pharmacological treatment for AVMs is currently nonexistent.65


Many factors can affect the clinical course of AVMs, including age at diagnosis and the management approach used. However, it is still not fully understood why some lesions remain quiescent while others grow, and the prognosis is therefore uncertain.

In the review by Lui et al.,43it was found that children with stage I AVMs had a 43.8% risk of progression before adolescence and an 82.6% risk of progression before adulthood. Gender, site of the lesion, and pregnancy were not found to affect the clinical course. With regard to treatment, poorer results were achieved by embolization without surgery.

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) secondary to trauma warrant special mention, as they also have an unpredictable course and their response to treatment differs from that of primary or congenital AVFs.66 Melliere et al.67 reported that the mean time between the trauma causing an AVF and diagnosis was approximately 20 years. High-flow AVFs could be associated with cardiac complications and those with intermediate flow could be associated with proximal arterial dilatation and be discovered later, with or without concomitant cardiac complications.


The AVMs are not well understood and are often incorrectly diagnosed. A multidisciplinary therapeutic approach is necessary, with surgeons and radiologists; the dermatologist must provide an early diagnostic suspicion.

The diagnosis is mainly clinical and is confirmed by Doppler ultrasound when doubt exists. As we have explained, difficulty arises when the lesion presents as a pink macule in the first months of life; at the present time there are no simple diagnostic tests that differentiate between one entity and another, and biopsy becomes necessary.

It is not always easy to choose the most appropriate treatment. Surgery is the treatment of choice for quiescent AVMs in areas amenable to surgical excision without significant loss of healthy tissue. There is doubt about whether or not to operate on AVMs localized on the head and neck before puberty, as this surgery is more destructive. However, if a surgically accessible AVM starts to grow, excision should be considered, with or without prior embolization. New medical treatments, such as inhibitors of the mTOR pathway, are being studied for advanced stages.62

As AVMs of the central nervous system (CNS) are 20 times more common than AVMs of the skin, they have been studied in much greater detail. However, conclusions drawn from AVMs of the CNS cannot be extrapolated to cutaneous AVMs, as we do not know if they behave in the same way. Nor do we know if the association between cutaneous AVMs and certain syndromes carries a poorer prognosis.

After an extensive review of the literature, and with the numerous questions that remain unanswered, we should expect more data to become available on this condition in the near future and for this to be followed by new treatment alternatives.

Ethical DisclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects.

The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this investigation.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that they followed their hospital's regulations regarding the publication of patient information and that written informed consent for voluntary participation was obtained for all patients.

Right to privacy and informed consent

The authors declare that no private patient data are disclosed in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

I.G. Fleetwood, G.K. Steinberg.
Arteriovenous malformations.
J.B. Mulliken, J. Glowacki.
Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: A classification based on endothelial characteristics.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 69 (1982), pp. 412-422
Richter GT, Friedman AB. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations: Current theory and management. Int J Pediatr [series on Internet]. 2012; 2012 [accessed 12 Jul 2012]. Available at:
A.H. Hassanein, J.B. Mulliken, S.J. Fishman, A.K. Greene.
Evaluation of terminology for vascular anomalies in current literature.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 127 (2011), pp. 347-351
M. El-Fiki.
Angiogenesis detection in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Mediators and gene expression, and treatment hopes for the future.
World Neurosurg, 78 (2012), pp. 422-424
A.G. Knudson.
Cancer genetics.
Am J Med Genet, 111 (2002), pp. 96-102
L.M. Buckmiller, G.T. Richter, J.Y. Suen.
Diagnosis and management of hemangiomas and vascular malformations of the head and neck.
P. Brouillard, M. Vikkula.
Genetic causes of vascular malformations.
Hum Mol Genet, 16 (2007), pp. R140-R149
S.G. Cole, M.E. Begbie, G.M. Wallace, C.L. Shovlin.
A new locus for hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT3) maps to chromosome 5.
J Med Genet, 42 (2005), pp. 577-582
V. Albiñana, M.E. Bernabeu-Herrero, R. Zarrabeitia, C. Bernabéu, L.M. Botella.
Estrogen therapy for hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT): Effects of raloxifene, on endoglin and ALK1 expression in endothelial cells.
Thromb Haemost, 103 (2010), pp. 525-534
D.W. Johnson, J.N. Berg, M.A. Baldwin, C.J. Gallione, I. Marondel, S.J. Yoon, et al.
Mutations in the activin receptor-like kinase 1 gene in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia type 2.
Nat Genet, 13 (1996), pp. 189-195
P. Corti, S. Young, C.Y. Chen, M.J. Patrick, E.R. Rochon, K. Pekkan, et al.
Interaction between alk1 and blood flow in the development of arteriovenous malformations.
Development, 138 (2011), pp. 1573-1582
L.M. Boon, J.B. Mulliken, M. Vikkula.
RASA 1 variable phenotype with capillary and arteriovenous malformations.
Curr Opin Genet Dev, 15 (2005), pp. 265-269
A.K. Greene, D.B. Orbach.
Management of arteriovenous malformation.
Clin Plast Surg, 38 (2011), pp. 102-104
W.H. Tan, H.N. Baris, P.E. Burrows, C.D. Robson, A.I. Alomari, J.B. Mulliken, et al.
The spectrum of vascular anomalies in patients with PTEN mutations: Implications for diagnosis and management.
J Med Genet, 44 (2007), pp. 594-602
C. Eng.
PTEN: One gene, many syndromes.
Hum Mutat, 22 (2003), pp. 183-198
L. Hueso, B. Llombart, A. Alfaro-Rubio, C. Serra-Guillén, C. Requena, M. González, et al.
Stewart-Bluefarb syndrome.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 98 (2007), pp. 545-548
P. Redondo.
Malformaciones vasculares (I): concepto, clasificación, patogénesis y aspectos clínicos.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 98 (2007), pp. 141-158
A.M. Kulungowski, S.J. Fishman.
Management of combined vascular malformations.
Clin Plast Surg, 38 (2011), pp. 107-120
M.M. Gomes, P.E. Bernatz.
Arteriovenous fistulae: A review and ten-year experience at the Mayo Clinic.
Mayo Clin Proc, 45 (1970), pp. 81-102
C.H. Yang, K. Ohara.
Acquired digital arteriovenous malformation: A report of three cases and study with epiluminescence microscopy.
Br J Dermatology, 147 (2002), pp. 1007-1011
D. Chen, X.J. Hu, X.X. Lin, G. Ma, Y.B. Jin, H. Chen, et al.
Nodules arising within port-wine stains: A clinicopthologic study of 31 cases.
Am J Dermatopathol, 33 (2011), pp. 144-151
T.H. Kim, E.H. Choi, S.K. Ahn, S.H. Lee.
Vascular tumors arising in port-wine stains: Two cases of pyogenic granuloma and a case of acquired tufted angioma.
J Dermatol, 26 (1999), pp. 813-816
E. Baselga, M. Wassef, S. Lopez, W. Hoffman, M. Cordisco, I.J. Frieden, et al.
Eruptive pyogenic granuloma-like lesions developing over congenital vascular stains.
Pediatr Dermatol, 29 (2012), pp. 186-190
M.C. Garzon, J.T. Huang, O. Enjolras, I.J. Frieden.
Vascular malformations: Part I.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 56 (2007), pp. 353-370
S.J. Lee, H.Y. Kim, B.S. Kim, D.W. Kim, H.Y. Chung, J.M. Lee, et al.
Capillary malformation of port-wine stain: Differentiation from early arteriovenous malformation by histopathological clues.
Am J Dermatopathol, 34 (2012), pp. 523-528
F. Trindate, O. Tellechea, A. Torrelo, L. Requena, I. Colmenero.
Wilms tumor 1 expression in vascular neoplasms and vascular malformations.
Am J Dermatopathol, 33 (2011), pp. 569-572
A. Gupta, H. Kozakewich.
Histopathology of vascular anomalies.
Clin Plast Surg, 38 (2011), pp. 31-44
I. Eerola, L.M. Boon, J.B. Mulliken, P.E. Burrows, A. Dompmartin, S. Watanabe, et al.
Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation, a new clinical and genetic disorder caused by RASA1 mutations.
Am J Hum Genet, 73 (2003), pp. 1240-1249
D. Hershkovitz, D. Bercovich, E. Sprecher, M. Lapidot.
RASA1 mutations may cause hereditary capillary malformations without arteriovenous malformations.
Br J Dermatol, 158 (2008), pp. 1035-1040
N. Revencu, L.M. Boon, J.B. Mulliken, O. Enjolras, M.R. Cordisco, P.E. Burrows, et al.
Parkes Weber syndrome, vein of Galen aneurysmal malformation, and other fast-flow vascular anomalies are caused by RASA1 mutations.
Hum Mutat, 29 (2008), pp. 959-965
K.B. Puttgen, M. Pearl, A. Tekes, S.E. Mitchell.
Update on pediatric extracranial vascular anomalies of the head and neck.
Childs Nerv Syst, 26 (2010), pp. 1417-1433
R. Arnold, G. Chaudry.
Diagnostic imaging of vascular anomalies.
Clin Plast Surg, 38 (2011), pp. 21-29
H.J. Paltiel, P.E. Burrows, H.P. Kozakewich, D. Zurakowski, J.B. Mulliken.
Soft-tissue vascular anomalies: utility of US for diagnosis.
J. Dubois, M. Alison.
Vascular anomalies: What a radiologist needs to know.
Pediatr Radiol, 40 (2010), pp. 895-905
Y. Ohgiya, T. Hashimoto, T. Gokan, S. Watanabe, M. Kuroda, M. Hirose, et al.
Dynamic MRI for distinguishing high-flow from low-flow peripheral vascular malformations.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 185 (2005), pp. 1131-1137
H. Moukaddam, J. Pollak, A.H. Haims.
MRI characteristics and classification of peripheral vascular malformations and tumors.
Skeletal Radiol, 38 (2009), pp. 535-547
A.M. Patel, E.L. Chou, L. Findeiss, K.M. Kelly.
The horizon for treating cutaneous vascular lesions.
Semin Cutan Med Surg, 31 (2012), pp. 98-104
J. Del Pozo, M. Gómez-Tellado, J.C. López-Gutiérrez.
Vascular malformations in childhood.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 103 (2012), pp. 661-678
A.K. Greene, D.B. Orbach.
Management of arteriovenous malformations.
Clin Plast Surg, 38 (2011), pp. 95-106
A.M. Kulungowski, A.H. Hassanein, V. Nosé, S.J. Fishman, J.B. Mulliken, J. Upton, et al.
Expression of androgen, estrogen, progesterone, and growth hormone receptors in vascular malformations.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 129 (2012), pp. 919e-924e
P.E. Burrows, J.B. Mulliken, S.J. Fishman, G.L. Klement, J. Folkman.
Pharmacological treatment of a diffuse arteriovenous malformation of the upper extremity in a child.
J Craniofac Surg, 20 (2009), pp. 597-602
A.S. Liu, J.B. Mulliken, D. Zurakowski, S.J. Fishman, A.K. Greene.
Extracranial arteriovenous malformations: natural progression and recurrence after treatment.
Plast Reconstr Surg, 125 (2010), pp. 1185-1194
I.C. Wu, D.B. Orbach.
Neurointerventional management of high-flow vascular malformations of the head and neck.
Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 19 (2009), pp. 219-240
C. Mounayer, N. Hammami, M. Piotin, L. Spelle, G. Benndorf, I. Kessler, et al.
Nidal embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations using Onyx in 94 patients.
Am J Neuroradiol, 28 (2007), pp. 518-523
F. Duffner, R. Ritz, A. Bornemann, D. Freudenstein, H. Wiendl, R. Siekmann.
Combined therapy of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: Histological differences between a non-adhesive liquid embolic agent and n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA).
Clin Neuropathol, 21 (2002), pp. 13-17
E.D. Akin, E. Perkins, I.B. Ross.
Surgical handling characteristics of an ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer compared with N-butyl cyanoacrylate used for embolization of vessels in an arteriovenous malformation resection model in swine.
J Neurosurg, 98 (2003), pp. 366-370
J.P. Deveikis.
Percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy for vascular malformations in the head and neck.
Arch Facial Plast Surg, (2005), pp. 322-325
I. Sánchez Carpintero, M.C. Mihm, M. Waner.
Láser y luz pulsada intensa en el tratamiento de hemangiomas infantiles y malformaciones vasculares.
An Sist Sanit Navarr, 27 (2004), pp. 103-115
P.S. Bekhor, M.R. Ditchfield.
Acquired digital arteriovenous malformation: Ultrasound imaging and response to long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet treatment.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 56 (2007), pp. S122-S124
J.A. Tournas, J. Lai, A. Truitt, Y.C. Huang, K.E. Osann, B. Choi, et al.
Combined benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid ring photodynamic therapy and pulsed dye laser for port wine stain birthmarks.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 6 (2009), pp. 195-199
W. Jerjes, T. Upile, Z. Hamdoon, C.A. Mosse, S. Akram, S. Morley, et al.
Interstitial PDT for vascular anomalies.
Lasers Surg Med, 43 (2011), pp. 357-365
K.H. Yuan, Q. Li, W.L. Yu, Z. Huang.
Photodynamic therapy in treatment of port wine stain birthmarks--recent progress.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 6 (2009), pp. 189-194
J. Borges da Costa, P. Boixeda, C. Moreno, J. Santiago.
Treatment of resistant port-wine stains with a pulsed dual wavelength 595 and 1064nm laser: A histochemical evaluation of the vessel wall destruction and selectivity.
Photomed Laser Surg, 27 (2009), pp. 599-605
H. Qiu, Y. Gu, Y. Wang, N. Huang.
Twenty years of clinical experience with a new modality of vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy for port wine stains.
Dermatol Surg, 37 (2011), pp. 1603-1610
X. Lu, K. Ye, H. Shi, W. Li, Y. Huang, X. Huang, et al.
Percutaneous endovenous treatment of congenital extratruncular venous malformations with an ultrasound-guided and 810nm diode laser.
J Vasc Surg, 54 (2011), pp. 139-145
J. Folkman.
Angiogenesis: An organizing principle for drug discovery?.
Nat Rev Drug Discov, 6 (2007), pp. 273-286
M.M. Benjamin, R.A. Khalil.
Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors as investigative tools in the pathogenesis and management of vascular disease.
M. Vikkula.
Vascular pathologies: Angiogenomics: Towards a genetic nosology and understanding of vascular anomalies.
Eur J Hum Genet, 15 (2007), pp. 821-822
A.K. Haemel, A.L. O’Brian, J.M. Teng.
Topical rapamycin: A novel approach to facial angiofibromas in tuberous sclerosis.
Arch Dermatol, 146 (2010), pp. 715-718
C.C. Trenor . 3rd.
Sirolimus for refractory vascular anomalies.
Pediatr Blood Cancer, 57 (2011), pp. 904-905
A.M. Hammill, M. Wentzel, A. Gupta, S. Nelson, A. Lucky, R. Elluru, et al.
Sirolimus for the treatment of complicated vascular anomalies in children.
Pediatr Blood Cancer, 57 (2011), pp. 1018-1024
T. Hashimoto, M.M. Matsumoto, J.F. Li, M.T. Lawton, W.L. Young.
Suppression of MMP-9 by doxycycline in brain arteriovenoous malformations.
BMC Neurol, 5 (2005), pp. 1
A. Blinc, T. Golli, A.C. Vodnik, S. Zver.
Concurrent thalidomide and radiation therapy for extensive arteriovenous malformations.
Thromb Haemost, 99 (2008), pp. 235-237
G.T. Richter, J.Y. Suen.
Pediatric extracranial arteriovenous malformations.
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 19 (2011), pp. 455-461
M. Chaudry, W.R. Flinn, K. Kim, D.G. Neschis.
Traumatic arteriovenous fistula 52 years after injury.
J Vasc Surg, 51 (2010), pp. 1265-1267
D. Mellière, R. Hassen-Khodja, J.M. Cormier, P. Le Bas, A. Mikati, H. Ronsse.
Proximal arterial dilatation developing after surgical closure of long-standing post-traumatic arteriovenous fistula.
Ann Vasc Surg, 11 (1997), pp. 391-396

Please cite this article as: de Miguel R, López-Gutierrez J, Boixeda P. Malformaciones arteriovenosas: un reto diagnóstico y terapéutico. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:347–358.

Copyright © 2012. Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas

Suscríbase a la newsletter

Opciones de artículo

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?