Información de la revista
Vol. 103. Núm. 6.
Páginas 456-477 (Julio - Agosto 2012)
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 103. Núm. 6.
Páginas 456-477 (Julio - Agosto 2012)
Acceso a texto completo
Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Plants: Understanding the Chemistry will Help our Diagnostic Approach
Dermatitis alérgica por contacto con plantas. Entender las bases químicas ayudará al enfoque diagnóstico
E. Rozas-Muñoza,??
Autor para correspondencia

Corresponding author.
, J.P. Lepoittevinb, R.M. Pujola, A. Giménez-Arnaua
a Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar. Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
b Dermatochemistry Laboratory, Institut of Chemistry, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Descargar PDF
Figuras (13)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Tablas (2)
Table 1. Important plants causing Allergic Contact Dermatitis to skin.
Table 2. Available allergens to patch test plants.
Mostrar másMostrar menos

Allergic contact dermatitis due to plants is common. Potentially allergenic plants and plant products are found in many everyday environments, such as the home, the garden, the workplace, and recreational settings. By improving our knowledge of allergenic plant-derived chemical compounds, we will be better positioned to identify novel allergens. We review the most relevant chemical allergens that contribute to plant allergic contact dermatitis and propose a clinical classification system based on 5 major families of chemical sensitizers: α-methylene-γ-butyrolactones, quinones, phenol derivatives, terpenes, and miscellaneous structures (disulfides, isothiocyanates, and polyacetylenic derivates). We also describe the different clinical pictures of plant allergic contact dermatitis and review currently available patch test materials. A better understanding of the specific allergens involved in plant allergic contact dermatitis will help to predict cross-reactivity between different plant species or families.

Contact dermatitis

La dermatitis alérgica por contacto debida a plantas es común. Se pueden encontrar plantas y productos vegetales potencialmente alergénicos en muchos entornos habituales como el hogar, el jardín, el lugar de trabajo y ambientes recreativos. Mejorando nuestro conocimiento de los compuestos químicos alergénicos derivados de plantas estaremos en una mejor posición para identificar alérgenos nuevos. Revisamos los alérgenos químicos que contribuyen de manera más relevante a la dermatitis alérgica por contacto por plantas y proponemos un sistema de clasificación clínica basado en 5 principales familias de sensibilizadores químicos: α−metilen-γ-butirolactonas, quinonas, derivados fenólicos, terpenos y estructuras misceláneas (disulfuros, isotiocianatos y derivados poliacetilénicos). Describimos también los diferentes cuadros clínicos de dermatitis alérgica por contacto por plantas y revisamos los materiales de pruebas epicutáneas actualmente disponibles. Un mejor entendimiento de los alérgenos específicos involucrados en la dermatitis alérgica por contacto por plantas ayudará a predecir reacciones cruzadas entre diferentes especies o familias de plantas.

Palabras clave:
Dermatitis de contacto
Texto completo

Plants are living organisms belonging to the kingdom of Plantae that includes at least 300000 species considering trees, herbs, bushes, grasses, vines, ferns, mosses and green algae. Although most plants are harmless to skin contact or ingestion, mild to serious adverse events are also well-recognized. Several cutaneous adverse reactions to plants such as non-immunological contact urticaria, irritant contact dermatitis, allergic contact dermatitis, photo-toxic contact dermatitis and photo-allergic contact dermatitis have been reported.

Allergic contact dermatitis is one of the most frequent cutaneous side effects in individuals exposed to plants. The study of the pathogenic mechanisms implicated in the development of allergic contact dermatitis to plants (ACDP) may be challenging. The large number of species, the diversity of chemical compounds that they contain and the simultaneous contact with more than one allergen may explain these difficulties.

A wide range of plants and plant allergens responsible for ACD have been identified and the different contact dermatitis triggers have often been classified according botanical criteria. These classifications are useful but do not allow predicting cross-reactivity among different species or families and require a botanical knowledge often cumbersome to physicians, dermatologists and allergologists. A possible classification of plant contact dermatitis according to the main chemical structures acting as allergens could be useful and may allow preventing future exposures to the responsible agent or its cross-reacting compounds that could be present in different species or families.

Our main objective is to review plant induced allergic contact dermatitis from the chemical point of view. The responsible plants are classified according their chemical allergens. Several families of chemical sensitizers causing different types of contact and photo-contact allergic dermatitis are reviewed (Table 1).

Table 1.

Important plants causing Allergic Contact Dermatitis to skin.

Scientific Name  Common Name  Distribution  Clinical Pattern  Allergen  Principal Use  Principal Affected Group 
Compositae family
Lactuca sativa  Lettuce  Widely cultivated  Hands and forearms dermatitis  SQL (lactucin and lactucopicrin)  Food  Occupational: food handlers (salad makers, greengrocers and market gardeners) 
Cichorium endivia  Endivie  Mediterranean area  Hand dermatitis  SQL  Food  Occupational: salad makers 
Chicorium intybus  Chicoriy, Escarole  Native to west and central Europe. Naturalized in South Africa, Australia, Usa and South America  Hand dermatitis  SQL (lactucin and lactucopicrin)  Food  Occupational: greengrocers and market gardeners 
Taraxacum officinale  Dandelion  Europe. Temperate regions including South Africa, USA and Australia  Pseudophotodermatitis, face dermatitis  SQL (taraxinicc acid)  Medicinal herb  Domestic 
Chrysanthemum spp.  Chrysanthemums spp.  Europe, Asia, Africa and America  Hand and face dermatitis  SQL (guaianolide)  Ornamental plants  Occupational: professional growers and florist 
Helenium autumnale L.  Sneezeweed, Bitterweed  North America  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL  Ornamental plant  Domestic 
Leucanthemum vulgare  Marguerites  Europe, Asia, USA  Local dermatitis  SQL  Weed  Occcupational: gardeners and florist 
Arnica montanaMontain tobacco  Northern hemisphere-temperate zone  Local dermatitis  SQL (helenalin and its esters)  Medicinal herb  Domestic (usado en heridas) 
Chamomilla recutita  Chamomile  Europe  Oral swelling, arms and trunk dermatitis  SQL (desacetylmatricarin)  Medicinal herb  Domestic 
Tanacetum parthenium  Feverfew  Europe  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL (parthenin)  Medicinal herb  Domestic 
Ambrosia spp.  Ragweeds  North America. Naturalized in Australia and India.  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL  Weed  Male farmers 
Artemisia spp.  Mugwort, Wormwood  Northern temperate regions  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL  Weed/spice/medicinal herb  Domestic 
Arctotheca  Capweed  Cape province, South Africa. Naturalized in Australia  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL  Weed  Domestic 
Conyza bonariensis  Fleabane, Horseweed  North and South America, Australia  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL  Weed  Domestic 
Cynara scolymus  Globe artichoke  Widely cultivated in Mediterranean regions and other temperate areas  Hand dermatitis  SQL (cynaropicrin)  Food  Occupational: pickers, market gardeners and flower arrangers 
Dittrichia viscosa  Sticky elecampane, Stinkwort  Mediterranean regions, Australia  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL (inuviscolide and 2-deacetoxyxanthinin)  Weed  Domestic: farm workers and gardeners 
Parthenium hysterophorus  Congress grass. Carrot weed  Central and south America. Southwest USA. India  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL (parthenin)  Weed  Adult male farmers 
Achillea millefolium  Yarrow  Europe (especially Britain)  Localized dermatitis, generalized dermatitis  SQL  Medicinal herb  Domestic 
Chamaemelum nobile  Sweet chamomile  Europe  Localized dermatitis, anaphylaxis  SQL (nobilin)  Lawn plant, herbal tea  Domestic 
Dahlia cvs.  Dahlia  Central America  Face, hand and arm dermatitis  SQL  Ornamental plant  Occupational: gardeners 
Inula helenium  Elecampane  Continental Europe, Asia  Local dermatitis  SQL (alantolactone)  Medicinal herb  Domestic 
Jubulaceae family
Frullania spp.    Worldwide, especially in temperate and sub-topical forests  Pseudophotodermatitis  SQL (frullanolide)  Liverworts  Occupational: forestry workers 
Liliaceae family
Tulipa spp.  Tulip  Europe, Mediterranean region; Asia  Tulip fingers  α-Methylene-γ-butyrolactones (tulipalin A)  Ornamental plants  Occupatinal: bulb growers 
Alstroemeriaceae family
Alstromeria  Peruvian lily  Andean foothills esp Chile and Peru. Widely grown as a border perennial and for cut flower  Tulip fingers  α-Methylene-γ-butyrolactones (tulipalin A)  Ornamental plants  Occupational: florist 
Anacardiaceae family
Toxicodendron radicans  Poison ivy  Eastern Asia and North and South America  Linear array dermatitis  Urushiol  Weed  Domestic and occupational (out door workers) 
Toxicodendron diversilobum  Western poison oak  West coast of North America  Linear array dermatitis  Urushiol  Weed  Domestic 
Toxicodendron toxicarium  Eastern poison oak  South-eastern USA  Linear array dermatitis  Urushiol  Weed  Domestic 
Toxicodendron striatum  Poison sumac  Central America and northern South America  Linear array dermatitis  Urushiol  Weed  Domestic 
Mangifera indica L.  Mango  Easterna Asia, Bruma and regions of India  Face dermatitis, stomatitis  Urushiol  Food  Domestic 
Anacardium occidentale L.  Cashew nut tree  Northeaster Brazil. Tropical countries  Linear array dermatitis, stomatitis  Anacardic acids and cardol  Food, manufacturing of other products  Domestic 
Toxicodendron verniciflua Stokes  Japanese lacquer tree  Japan and China  Local eczema  Urushiol  varnish  Domestic and lacquer workers 
Ginkgoaceae family
Ginkgo biloba L.  Ginkgo tree  China, Europe and temperate regions  Hand, face and arm dermatitis  Ginkgolic acid  Ornamental and food  Domestic 
Proteacea family
Grevillea spp.  Silk oak  Australia and southern USA  Linear array dermatitis  Pentadecylresorcinol, tridecylresorcinol  Ornamental  Domestic 
Primulaceae family
Primula obconica  Primula  China and Europe  Facial dermatitis with limb or hand dermatitis  Primin  Ornamental  Occupational: gardeners and florist 
Rutaceae family
Citrus lemon  Lemon  Widely cultivated  Hand dermatitis  Geraniol, citral and d-limonene  Food  Food handlers 
Citrus sinensis  Orange  Widely cultivated  Hand dermatitis  Geraniol, citral and d-limonene  Food  Food handlers 
Citrus aurantium  Bergamot  Widely cultivated  Hand dermatitis  Geraniol, citral and d-limonene  Food  Food handlers 
Alliaceae family
Allium sativum  Garlic  Worldwide  Fingertip dermatitis  Diallyl disulfide  Food  Occupationa: food handlers 
Cruciferae family
Raphanus sativus  Radish  Worldwide  Hand dermatitis  Isothiocyanate  Food  Domestic 
Brassica oleracea  Cabbage  Worldwide  Hand dermatitis  Isothiocyanate  Food  Domestic 
Brassica nigra  Black mustard  Central and southern Europe  Variable, hand dermatitis, local dermatitis  Isothiocyanate  Food  Food handler 
Brassica oleracea v botrytis  Caouliflower  Worldwide  Hand dermatitis  Isothiocyanate  Food  Plant grower 
Capparaceae family
Capparis spinosa  Caper bush  Mediterranean, extending to Asia  Local dermatitis  Isothiocyanate  Food  Domestic 
Araliaceae family
Hedera helix  Common ivy  Europe, North Africa and Asia  Linear array dermatitis  Falcarinol and didehydrofalcarinol  Weed  Domestic 
Apiaceae family
Centella asiatica  Asian pennywort  Asia  Local dermatitis  Madecassic acid, asiatic acid and asiaticoside  Medicinal herb  Domestic 
Daucus carota vars.  Carrot  Temperate areas  Hand dermatitis  Falcarinol  Food  Occupational: canning factories workers 

SQL: sesquiterpene lactones.

Plant Contact Dermatitis Classified by its Chemical Responsible Allergenic Structureα-Methylene-γ-Butyrolactones

The α-methylene-γ-butyrolactones are part of a large and varied group of bioactive natural products widely present in plants. They have an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl system which allows the formation of covalent adducts with nucleophilic residues on diverse biomolecules which explains their high chemical reactivity. Most of them are of the sesquiterpene type (15 carbon atoms molecule) with an α-methylene group directed exocyclically to the γ-lactone ring. They are classified into six main groups of sesquiterpene lactone (SQL) structures: guaianolide, pseudoguaianolide, xanthonolide, ermophilanolide, eudesmanolide and germacranolide (Fig. 1). They are the predominant allergens in the Compositae family as well as in other related plant families such as Jubulaceae, Magnoliaceae, Winteraceae, and Lauraceae.1 The α-methylene-γ-butyrolactones can also be found as more simple structures in the Liliaceae (tulipaline A) and Alstroemeraceae families.

Figure 1.

Chemical structures of main groups of sesquiterpene lactones.

Asteraceae or Compositae Family

The Asteraceae/Compositae family also referred to as the aster, daisy or sunflower family, comprise the second largest family of flowering plants in the world. It includes more than 22750 currently accepted species, spread across 1620 genera and 12 subfamilies. Over 200 species are important causes of contact dermatitis worldwide.2,3 This family presents a variety of edible plants, such as lettuce, chicory, dandelion, salsify, sunflower, scorzonera, artichoke and yacon. Many members are decorative flowers, such as chrysanthemums, gerbera, calendula, dendranthema, dahlias, and heleniums and many others are spread as common weeds. Also, species such as arnica, chamomile or feverfew are used medicinally. Asteraceae/Compositae can be recognized by its inflorescence consists of many tiny flowers clustered to form a flower head and subtended by an involucre.

SQLs are the predominant allergens although other compounds such as epoxythymol-diesters and polyacetylenes may also be involved.4 SQLs are usually lipophilic, and are often located in the liquid-soluble part (oleoresin fraction) of the leaf, stem flower and possibly in the polen.2,4,5 Although the mechanism of sensitization is unknown, several possibilities have been proposed: pollen or dry debris airborne transportation; direct and/or indirect contact with parts of the plant; as well as allergen inhalation or ingestion.4,6

Some peculiar cutaneous eruptions caused by Asteraceae/Compositae family have been described. The pseudophotodermatitis pattern occurs almost exclusively in middle-aged men with a history of outdoor exposure, being rare in children and women, although further studies have suggested an equal sex distribution.6,7 Exposed areas of the face, V of neck, hands and forearms are typically involved. In addition, non-clear-cut sun exposed areas such as retroauricular regions (“Wilkinson's triangle”), eyelids, nasolabial folds and under the chin are also involved, allowing its differentiation from a true photo-related dermatitis.7 In hot regions, during summer months dry dead plants material contributes to this airborne pattern of dermatitis. In USA, many compositae weed, including ragweed (Ambrosia spp.), induce this clinical pattern often called “ragweed dermatitis8 or “weed dermatitis” in regions where other composite weeds predominate, such as Ambrosia, Artemisia, Helenium, and Iva species.9,10 A similar pattern was described in Australia where it is known as “bush dermatitis” due to species such as Arctotheca, Cassini, Conyza, Cynara and Dittrichi11,12 and also in India where it is called “parthenium dermatitis” being the offending plant the Parthenium hysterophorus L.13,14 Although this environmental conditions are not normally encountered in the temperate regions of Europe, some isolated reports of airborne dermatitis (“ragweed dermatitis”) induced by feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.), chicory and lettuce, liverworts of the genus Frullania, and the chrysanthemums1,6,9 have exceptionally been reported.

A second special clinical pattern was described as atopic eczema-like eruption. Compositae allergy may be manifested as a generalized eczematous eruption with primarily flexural involvement. Although it most commonly occurs in elderly men in rural areas, cases in children have also been reported.4,15 An erythrodermic exfoliative pattern classically induced by weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. was also described. This plant was accidentally introduced in the west coast of India in contaminated seed wheat. Several thousands of cases of allergic contact dermatitis occurred, some of them fatal.16

Hand eczema is more frequent in women working in gardening after contact with weeds. A palmar distribution often predominates.17 Hand dermatitis is also associated with handling lettuce.18,19 Dermatitis confined to one or more localized areas such as facial dermatitis secondary to steaming chamomile tea or hand and arm dermatitis from herbal compresses20 has rarely been reported. Oral swelling, perianal pruritus and dermatitis of the trunk and arms were described in a sensitized drank chamomile tea patient.20 Stomatitis and throat swelling have occurred in some patients after eating lettuce and endivia.21 In one single patient erythema multiforme was reported to develop after patch testing.22

A rare chronic and disabling eccematous photodermatosis known as chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD), photosensitive dermatitis and actinic reticuloid has been linked to the ACD to compositae. A high incidence of allergic contact dermatitis to one or more allergens has been found among patients with CAD,23 and sesquiterpene lactones are commonly identified as allergens. It is thought that about 20%–75% of patients sensitized to Asteracea (Compositae) have some degree of photosensitivity. Thus, the progressive evolution of ACD to sesquiterpene lactones towards CAD has been postulated, but its origin is still unknown.

Patch Test

No ideal patch testing material to study Compositae induced dermatitis exists. Compositae family includes more than 1350 SQLs and almost 50% of them are potential contact allergens.2 SQLs with slight differences in molecular structure, may cause true cross-reactions, while identical SQLs from different species may be responsible of false cross-reactions. SQLs are not exclusive from the Compositae family and frequently show cross-reactions with other plant families. Because the concentration of SQLs shows seasonal and geographic variations and as cross-reactions between different species are not complete, when a patient is not tested with the relevant plants, the diagnosis may be easily overlooked.

Fresh plants or plant extracts should not be patch tested as them are. This procedure may cause severe contact reactions and can also elicit active sensitization. False positive irritant reactions or false negative results caused by low content of allergens (degradation products) can also occur.

In 1986, Benezra and Epstein developed the “sesquiterpene lactone mix” (SL mix) a non-sensitizing and seldom irritant mixture of three of the six main structural groups of sesquiterpene lactones (alantolactone, costunolide and dehydrocostuslactone of eremophilanolide, germacranolide and guaianolide group) (Fig. 2). This mixture allows to identify about 60% of SQL sensitization cases24 and was included in the European baseline series.17 Other studies19,25–27 reported different percentages, which can partly be explained by phytogeographical variations and the diversity of SQL structures.28 An alternative preparation, the Compositae mix, based on a mixture of plant extracts (arnica, yarrow, tansy, German chamomile and feverfew), detects a higher proportion of the cases, however, it may be irritant and cause patch test sensitization.29

Figure 2.

Structures of alantolactone, dehydrocostuslactone and costunolide, constituents of the SL mix test material.


Dandelion and feverfew extracts, together or individually, also appear to be more useful than the SL mix.30,31 Other blends have been proposed, such as a mixture of Achillea millefolium L., Chamaemelum nobile All., Helianthus anuus L., Tagetes minuta L., and Tanacetum vulgare L. as well as extracts mixtures of arnica, German chamomile, feverfew, tansy, and yarrow.27

Jubulaceae Family (Liverworts)

Liverworts are non-vascular plants with a bryophyte life cycle. They comprise four genera: Frullania accounts for nearly 800 species, Jubula 15, whereas Steerea and Neohattoria are both montypic. These plants are often epiphytes growing on trunks and branches of trees or shrubs presenting a worldwide distribution, being rare common in tropical and subtropical regions and rare in frigid climates. They are often resistant to desiccation and direct light. Jubula species are largely confined to damp shaded rock surfaces.

At least 11 species of Frullania have been described as responsible of allergic contact dermatitis.32Frullania dilatata (L.) Dum. and Frulanina tamarisci (L.) Dum. have been frequently incriminated in Europe. Cases of allergic contact dermatitis were also described in the British Columbia (Canada), the Pacific North-West of the United States, and in the South-West of France.

The most important allergen is frullanolide,33–35 an α-methylene-γ-butyrolactone sesquiterpene from the eudesmanolide structural group. Other α-methylene-γ-butyrolactones have been reported as sensitizers such as oxyfrullanolide 5, cis-b-cycloscotunolide 6 and eremofrullanolide 7.35–37Frullania dilatata (L.) Dum. contains exclusively the d- or (+)-enantiomer of frullanolide while Frullania tamarisci (L.) Dum. exclusively yields the l- or (−)-enantiomer.36 Both enantiomers are sensitizers, and in guinea pigs the stereospecificity of sensitization to one enantiomer has been demonstrated 36,37 (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Chemical structures of d-(+)- and l-(−)-frullanolide.


Sensitization to Frullania can occur by direct handling of trees or by airborne through volatilization of its small particles, especially during warm weather or by the action of chainsaws.34,35 Forester workers often suffer from “woodcutter's eczema” and domestic allergy can be presented in people who use lobe-leaved trees as firewoods. Exposed areas of skin are typically affected, with an “airborne” pattern on the face and the V of the neck. This clinical pattern can mimic a photosensitivity pattern but involving shaded areas such as the eyelids and nasolabial folds. The hands may become edematous, with involvement of finger webs but often sparing of the palms. Exceptional involvement of the genitalia and intertriginous folds has also been reported.38

Patch Test

Testing the patient with small pieces of Frullania is associated with a high risk of active sensitization. The SQL mix only detects about 1% of allergic reactions to Frullania. The frullanolide mix, a racemic mixture of (+)- and (−)-frullanolide at 0.01%, 0.033% and 0.1% in petrolatum39 is a safe and not sensitizing test, but only shows a 0.35% of positive reactions.

Testing the patient with small pieces of Frullania is associated with a high risk of active sensitization, however, it could be used if there is high clinical suspicion. Frullanolide mix, a racemic mixture of (+)- and (−)-frullanolide at 0.01%, 0.033% and 0.1% in petrolatum39 has been used in several clinical trials proving to be a safe and not sensitizing test, but with a lower sensitivity than the SQL mix. Therefore the allergen of choice in this cases is SQL mix, even thought it only detects 1% of the allergic reactions to Frullania.

Cross-reactions with botanically unrelated plants that contain similar allergens, e.g. Laurus nobilis L.,35Magnolia grandiflora L.40 and several Compositae may also occur.32,41,42


Tulip genus which comprises 109 species of showy flowers is the most important genus of the Liliaceae family. A number of species and many hybrid cultivars are growing in gardens, used as pot plants or as fresh cut flowers. Most cultivars of tulip are derived from Tulipa gesneriana. Professional bulb growers, bulb collectors, sorters and packers are particularly at risk of contact dermatitis.

Tulip bulbs contain several glucosides including tuliposides A and B, which are weakly allergenic but are rapidly hydrolysed to tulipalin A and B. Tulipalin A appears to be the main sensitizer in clinical practice43 although tulipalin B also causes sensitization in guinea pigs44 (Fig. 4). Flowers, leaves and stems possess higher concentrations of tuliposide A than the bulbs; but sensitivity can develop from contact with any portion of the plant, although most of the cases occur in bulb growers who are continuously handling the bulbs. Contact with airborne allergens, although infrequent has also been reported.45

Figure 4.

Chemical structures of tulipalin A and B.


The most common presentation is a combined allergic and irritant hand dermatitis known as “tulip fingers”. It is characterized by a painful, subungual and periungual erythemato-squamous, sometimes erosive lesions involving the fingertips, particularly the first and second fingers of the dominant hand.46 There may be fissures, suppuration and hyperkeratosis. The dermatitis may extend to the adjacent skin and rarely may involve distant areas or even give rise to a diffuse dermatitis.45,47 The dust in tulip sheds may induce conjunctivitis, rhinitis and asthma. Reaginic responses to tulip antigens can also occur.47


These species have a cluster of tuberous roots and produce leafy stems, bearing one to several brightly colored flowers. Several species are found in special collections and only two species are widely distributed and produced: Alstroemeria aurantiaca D. Don, with orange flowers, who grows as a border plant, particularly in cottage gardens, and Alstroemeria ligtu (Peruvian lilies) which give rise to numerous colors, mostly in shades of lilac and pink, with darker veins and mottling on the petals (Fig. 5). They grow in Holland, South America, USA and Australia. Tulipalin A, the same allergen of the Liliaceae family, is the main responsible sensitizer, being found mainly in the petals and stem. The rate of sensitization for tulipalin A can exceed 50% in workers of Alstroemeria cultivation.48

Figure 5.



Dermatitis most commonly affects florist who strip off the leaves manually and are therefore exposed to the broken plant with a high risk of allergic contact dermatitis. The lesions, in contrast to the “tulip finger dermatitis, can be more severe and tend to involve the fingertips of all digits of both hands. Occasionally, the clinical pattern can be very similar to that produced by the garlic clove (but in a bilateral and symmetric distribution).49 Workers who cut the flowers often show palm eczema.50–55 Airborne dermatitis56 and post-inflammatory depigmentation have rarely been reported.57 False positive responses due to a primary irritant reactions may also occur.58

Patch testing Liliaceae and Alstroemeriaceae

Patch test with short ether extract of the leaves and petals as well as direct testing with them is not recommended because of the high risk of active sensitization.58 Since pure tulip allergen is not readily available, patch tests may be performed with outermost bulb scales, after removal of the brown skin. To obviate dependence on seasonal supplies, extracts may be prepared from bulbs which have been tested for allergenicity.59

Several ways of performing patch testing have been recommended. A 96% ethanol extract of tulip bulbs or an extract prepared by shaking fresh bulbs for 90min in acetone (80% in water) using 1% of this extract in 70% ethanol was recommended by Hjorth et al.59 A methanol extract of the fresh petal or leaf/stem material in petrolatum at a 0.001% concentration was recommended by Hausen et al.58 A 6-tuliposide A at 0.01% or an α-methylene-γ-butyrolactone at 0.0001% in ethanol was proposed by Santucci et al.51

Patients with allergic contact dermatitis to Alstroemeria generally cross-react to tulip extracts.57,60 No cross-reactions between the sesquiterpene lactones and tulipalin A, have been reported (even though considering that both contain an α-methylene-γ-butyrolactone in the lactone ring61).

Phenol and Derivates

This is a group of mono- or dihydroxybenzene derivatives of phenol, catechol, resorcinol or salicylic acid with a long alkyl or alkenyl carbon side chain. Mixtures of catechols with alk(en)yl side chains are also known as urushiol and are the main allergens in the toxicodendron genus. Phenols, resorcinols, and salicylic acid with alk(en)yl side chains are called cardanol, grevillol and ginkgolic acid, respectively and are the main allergic contact sensitizers in the Anacardiaceae, Gingkgoaceae and Proteaceae family respectively. They are very good examples of prohaptens, that is, non-electrophilic substances which have to undergo a chemical transformation, like oxidation, to give the active substance. Thus, many phenolic derivatives are metabolized into ortho-quinones or para-quinones, which are strong electrophiles62 (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

General structures of sensitizing alk(en)yl aromatic derivatives.


The Anacardiaceae family also known as the “cashew family” or the “sumac family” is a very wide family of flowering plants. This family includes about 70 genera and 650 species of evergreen deciduous trees, shrubs, and woody vines. These plants are native from tropical and subtropical areas of the world, but some species occurs in temperate regions too. Members of the Anacardiaceae plant family that are important in dermatology include: the Toxicoendron genus, (common poison ivy, poison oak, poison sumac), Mangifera indica L. (mango), Toxicodendron vernicifluum (lacquer tree) and Anacardium occidentale L. (cashew nut).

Toxicodendron Genus

Toxicodendron is the most allergenic genus of this family. It includes the poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans Kuntze and subspecies such as T. radicans Kuntze var, rydbergii Erskine), the poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum Greene and Toxicodendron toxicarium Gillis), and the poison sumac (Toxicodendron striatum Kuntze, T. vernix Kuntze) complexes. These genera are the main causes of allergic contact dermatitis in the United States and approximately 50%–70% of the population seems to be sensitized.63

Occupational contact dermatitis to poison ivy is an important cause of occupational disability and contributes significantly to the monetary expense of the health system in the United States. Wilderness, rural and outdoor activities as well as outdoor occupations related to agriculture, forestry, and fire fighting, are at high risk of sensitization.64

The poison ivy dermatitis is generally unknown in Europe. The plants can be recognized by its compound leaves, with three or more smaller leaflets. Flowers and fruit arise in the angle between the leaf and the twig. The leaf stalk also leaves a “U”- or “V”-shaped scar after it falls off.65

The pentadecylcatechols, consisting of 1, 2-dihydroxy benzenes with a 15-atom side chain in the third position (3-pentadecylcatechol), also called urushiols are the sensitizers in the Toxicodendron plants. Urushiols are colorless or slightly64 yellow in their natural state, but they oxidize, polymerize and turn black when exposed to air. Urushiol is found in the stems, roots, leaves and skin of the fruits of these plants and also on fomites, where it retains its antigenic potential in the dry state indefinitely.66 Young leaves contain greater amount of urushiol than the older ones.67

Contact dermatitis primarily results from the direct contact with the oleoresin obtained from a portion of a bruised or injured plant. However, contamination and re-exposure to the antigen may occur, being the most important reservoirs the fingernails, clothing, animals, garden tools or firewood.10,68 Contact dermatitis usually appears within 2–4 days, however it may appear as late as 2 weeks after the history of contact. It is characterized by intense pruritus and an erythematous reaction followed by the appearance of multiple papules and vesiculo-bullous lesions in a linear distribution (Fig. 7). The face, neck, and genitalia are commonly affected and usually show intense oedema. The dermatitis has a self-limiting course, lasting approximately 1–2 weeks, but can last up to 6 weeks.64

Figure 7.

Erythematous linear arrays and erythema multiforme-like lesions on right elvow after contact with poison ivy.


Other clinical presentations include erythema multiforme-like reactions,69 exanthematous and urticarial eruptions, and even renal damage that, may occur after accidental, medicinal or alimentary ingestion.70,71 Stomatitis and anal itch have been described after chewing the leaves or secondary to hyposensitization treatments. The “black spot poison ivy dermatitis” is a rare and very special condition, consisting of asymptomatic black lesions on the skin that cannot be washed off. These lesions are followed by subsequent pruritic papules and have been mistaken for melanoma in several cases.72

Patch Test

The plant oleoresin diluted 1:10 in acetone may be used for patch testing. The pure synthetic antigen, 3-pentadecylcatechol, may also be used in various dilutions, but is not readily available and probably does not contain all the antigenic materials of the poison ivy oleoresin.73

Mango (Mangifera indicaL.) is a fruit found in eastern Asia, Burma and regions of India which has been widely cultivated throughout the world, in particularly Hawaii, Florida, Mexico and Central America.

The responsible allergens are three resorcinols derivatives: heptadecadienylresorcinol, heptadecenylresorcinol and pentadecylresorcinol.74 They are found in stems, leaves, and peel, but not in the fruit juice that may be drunk by sensitized persons. Allergic contact dermatitis occurs after touching the fruit with the peel intact. Dermatitis can be limited to vesicles at the commissures of the mouth but it usually affects the entire perioral area, and it may affect the buccal mucosa and face. The hands can carry allergen to the eyes and neck, and these eruptions sometimes become generalized. Some rare cases of systemic contact dermatitis have also been reported after ingestion by people previously sensitized by contact.75 Climbing the tree can result in allergic dermatitis due to the content of urushiol in the leaves and bark of the tree. Symptoms of wheezing have also been reported, presumably due to an immediate hypersensitivity reaction.

Patch test: Leaves bark but not fruit extracts could be used to demonstrate contact allergy. There is not a standardized procedure and a possible active sensitization should be taken into account. Cross hypersensitivity between the allergens of mango and the Anacardiaceae and Gingkoaceae families has been reported.74

Cashew nut tree (Anacardium occidentaleL.) is a small tree native to northeastern Brazil but is harvested now in most tropical countries. The tree produces a kidney shaped fruit (cashew nut) that grows at the end of the accessory fruit called the cashew apple. The cashew nuts are composed of an internal kernel and a double-layered outer shell. Between the two layers of the shell irritant and allergenic oil is found. The nuts are used in the food industry as a substitute for almonds. The oil obtained from the nut shells (cashew nut shell liquid) is used in manufacturing various products. Friction dust is used for brake linings and clutch facings, epoxy resins, paints, varnishes, and foundry core oil as well as insecticides to control mosquito larvae and schistosomiasis vectors.

Anacardic acid (a mixture of 2-carboxyl-3-alkyl phenols) and cardol (a mixture of 5-alkyl resorcinols such as 5-pentadecadienylresorcinol), are the most important allergens.36 Any part of the cashew tree, except the roasted nut, can induce dermatitis76 however allergic contact dermatitis is generally caused by direct contact with the oil. Topical contact with the oil can induce the same type of reaction seen in individuals exposed to poison ivy.77 Oral ingestion can lead to stomatitis and pruritus ani78 and even to widespread dermatitis with flexural accentuation, typically distributed on the extremities, groin, and buttocks. This eruption occurs generally from 1 to 3 days after ingestion of raw cashew nuts contaminated with allergenic oil.79 Dermatitis, resulting from sensitized children handling and playing with the nuts, has been reported.80 Improperly shelled cashew nuts caused an outbreak of perioral and more generalized dermatitis in Pennsylvania.81

Patch test: There is not a standardized patch test recommendation for cashew nut oil, although a 30% in pet. concentration has been occasionally used.82 The occurrence of cross-sensitivity between the urushiols of the poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans Kuntze) and the cashew nut allergen has long been recognized.83,84

Toxicodendron vernicifluaStokes (Japanese lacquer tree) is an indigenous tree of Japan and China. From its trunk yields a milky juice, which on contact with air darkens and becomes a durable lacquer used as varnish on furniture, floors, tea pots, rifle stocks, canes, wooden toilet seats and ornaments. All plant parts as well as lacquered objects can trigger an allergic phytodermatitis, even after many years.85 The allergens are also urushiols, but they differ from poison ivy's by the positions of the double bonds on the 15-carbon side chain at positions 8, 11 and 13 instead of 8, 11 and 14 positions in poison ivy's urushiols.86

Clinical features are variable, according to the mode and sites of contact, and the degree of sensitivity. The most common is an inflammatory reaction and erythema at the site of contact with the varnish, however more extensive persistent and severe cases have been described.87 Dermatitis of the face induced by burning logs from lacquer trees has also been reported.88

Patch test: Previous experience is scarce and there is any special protocol and general recommendation for plants should be follow. Patients allergic to poison ivy usually cross-react to Japanese lacquer tree urushiol.86

Ginkgoaceae Family

Ginkgo biloba L., the ginkgo tree, is the only representative of this family and is regarded as one of the world's oldest surviving tree species. Originating in southeastern China 200 million years ago, it was introduced to Europe during the early 18th century, and now it grows in temperate regions throughout the world. Contact dermatitis from the ginkgo tree is not due to its leaves but to its malodorous fruit exclusively borne in female trees.

The alkylphenols (anacardic or ginkgolic acids, cardols and cardanols) have been identified as the potential allergens. Ginkgolic acid 1, the most important allergen, is found mainly in the fruit, but can also be detected in Ginkgo leaves.89 Allergic reactions seem to occur only with open fruit extruding pulp. Handling the intact fruit is not harmful to sensitive persons.90

Contact dermatitis occurs especially in East Asians, who enjoy eating the “nuts” (seed kernels), and manipulate the seeds to remove the fleshy pulp and obtain the kernels. Pruritic, edematous and erythematous plaques with papules or vesicles appear on the hands, face, arms and anywhere the seed pulp is spread. Ingestion may also cause stomatitis and anal pruritus.91 While reactions are uncommon in the West, a small epidemic occurred among a group of schoolgirls who stomped upon fallen fruit. They developed a streaky, vesicular dermatitis on their legs, similar that poison ivy contact dermatitis.92

Patch Test

Ginkgo fruit pulp 1–10 in acetone is recommended for patch testing,91 avoiding irritancy at this concentration, whereas the fruit pulp itself is strongly irritant.92,93

Proteaceae Family

The Proteaceae family comprises 1050 species in 62 genera and is found predominantly in the tropics. The most important genus of this family is the genus Grevillea which is made up of approximately 360 species, most native of Australia, where they range from low shrubs to forest trees. A number of different Grevillea species and hybrids, specially of the eugrevillea section, appear to cause allergic contact dermatitis.94 The most important species are Grevillea robusta Cunn, also known as silky oak or silver oak and Grevillea x Robyn Gordon a natural hybrid between Grevillea banksii R. Br. and Grevillea bipinnatifida R. Br. which is perhaps the most important plant in this genus from human health perspective and probably represent the most common cause of plant-induced dermatitis in Australia.95

The allergens appear to be different between the species and among their hybrids. The allergens of G. robusta are 5-tridecylresorcinol (grevillol), 5-pentadecylresorcinol and 5-pentadecenylyresorcinol. Grevillea banksii R. Br. shows the resorcinol derivative pentadecylresorcinol. Others long carbon chain alkenyl resorcinol are also the haptens in Grevillea Robyn Gordon.96

Contact with the wild and cultivated tree, especially with the flowers, as well as with objects made with its wood, induces a bullous eruption similar to that caused by poison ivy and poison oak (Toxicodendron spp.).97 Grevillea poisoning was described among men who cut the fallen trees and developed a severe bullous contact reaction.98

Patch Test

The 0.1% ethanol extract of Grevillea flower in petrolatum has been used to patch test. Because the allergens of Grevillea are related chemically with the Toxicodendron genus cross-sensitivity can be seen. Patients who are known to be sensitive to Toxicodendron should avoid Grevillea species contact and vice versa.


This is a group of (poly)cyclic organic compounds with at least one six-membered unsaturated ring to which two oxygen atoms are bonded as carbonyl groups (CO). They represent oxidized forms of ortho- or para-diphenol. They are strong electrophiles substances that easily react with the nucleophilic groups of proteins, acting then as strong haptens.

The most important allergens are benzoquinones or naphthoquinones. At high concentrations, they are primary irritants. They are the main sensitizers present in tropical woods as well as in some families of plants, among them the Primulaceae family being the most important.


Primulaceae is a wide family of flowering plants with about 1000 species in 24 genera. Despite its large number of specimens and cosmopolitan distribution only Primula spp. presents a common dermatological hazard. Primula was exported from China to England in the year 1880. Their beautiful flowers, long flowering period and their ease of care, helped a quick introduction into Europe, with less success in America. For a number of years Primula obconica Hanse was the most common cause of plant-induced contact dermatitis in Europe, however since the introduction of primin-free P. obconica Hanse into the European market, its incidence has declined.99 Other species of Primula are reported to be allergenic, such as P. auricula L., P. denticulata Sm. and P. vulgaris Huds, and vary widely in their allergen content.100–102

The primin (2-methoxy-6-n-pentyl-p-benzoquinone) is the major allergen of primrose dermatitis, a quinone formed by oxidation of its biosynthetic precursor miconidin (Fig. 8), however other allergens such as primetin (a flavone),103 and miconidin (2-methoxy-6-pentyl-1,4-dihydroxybenzene)104 has also been suggested. Primin is contained in the terminal cells of the microscopic glandular hairs on the surface of the leaves, stems and flowers. The allergen content of the plant varies considerably, depending on season, the number hours of sunshine, the method of cultivation, and the horticultural variety, which explains the striking seasonal variation in its allergenicity, being greatest in the summer and lower in winter months.

Figure 8.

Chemical structures of primin and miconodin.


Sensitization to P. obconica Hance can occur by direct contact with plants or by indirect contact, e.g. via hand-shakes, door handgrips or paper fibers. Primin can be released through pollen or small dust particles, causing an air-borne allergic contact dermatitis in some sensitized patients.105

Dermatitis most commonly occurs in elderly women and a variety of cutaneous reactions have been described: Facial dermatitis, alone or combined with limb dermatitis and hand dermatitis.42,106,107 Eruptions vary from linear to erythematous papules, vesicles and bullae, and to erythema-multiforme and lichen planus like lesions.108–113 Few cases of airborne dermatitis and111,114,115 facial eruption mimicking herpes simplex116 as well as one case presenting as vitiligo117 have also been reported.

In order to reduce the incidence of allergic primin contact dermatitis, a primin-free Primula obconica Hance was developed.118 Although its introduction reduced significantly the cases of among cultivars, it still remains as an important contact allergen, justifying its maintenance in the standard series.

Patch Test

Primin 0.01% in petrolatum is included in the European baseline series.


The terpenes represent a large class of hydrocarbon compounds, produced by a wide variety of plants, particularly the Conifers. They are the main components of most of the essential oils.

The terpenes are composed biosynthetically by units of isoprene, which has the molecular formula C5H8. Chemically, terpenes are multiples of isoprene units, (C5H8)n where “n” is the number of linked units. The terpenes are classified by the number of isoprene units included in the complete molecule: hemiterpenes (a single isoprene unit), monoterpenes (two isoprene units, e.g. limonene, pinene and 3-carene), sesquiterpenes (three isoprene units), diterpenes (four isoprene units) and so on. Terpenes by themselves are not sensitizers because they lack of electrophilic properties necessary to bind covalently to skin proteins. They act as prehaptens and need a chemical transformation in order to become true haptens.

Turpentine, a variable mixture of numerous terpenoid compounds, is one of the most important terpene representatives. The turpentine is obtained from the oleoresin of various pine species. Turpentine could easily auto oxidize into hydroperoxides (3-carene, α-pinene and β-pinene) and these later can evolve into ketones and aldehydes which are excellent electrophilic substances. Another important example of sensitizing terpene is colophony. Colophony is the residue left after distilling off the volatile oil from the oleoresin obtained from Pinus sylvestris L. and other species (Fig. 9).

Figure 9.

Chemical structures of some terpenes.


This family includes 900 species in 150 genera which are found in tropical and temperate regions especially in southern Africa and Australia. Is an important cause of phototoxic reactions although some cases of ACD of the citrus genus have also been reported.

Citrus Genus

Twelve species are native to southern China, south-east Asia and Indo-Malaysia; however, with the aim of achieving greater fruits, with more juice, better taste and lack of seeds, numerous other species have emerged from various artificial crosses. The most common species are Citrus sinensis L. (orange), Citrus aurantium L. (Bergamot) and Citrus Limon L. Burm. Fil. (lemon). Besides its use in the food industry, citrus used to carry out aromatic oils from the flowers and fur, used in perfumery and in the manufacture of soaps and cosmetics.

Allergic contact dermatitis to citrus fruits is unusual and hand dermatitis has been described in food handlers.119 The potential sensitizers include geraniol, citral and a the hydroperoxide derivative of d-limonene120 which are usually included in fragrances and its mechanism of sensitization is nowadays a source of research.

Patch Test

Although oxidized limonene is available as commercial allergen to be patch tested at 3% in petrolatum (from Chemotechnique). A being multicenter study directed by Ann Therese Karlberg from Gothenborg, Sweden with oxidized limonene and linalol is currently performed. A recommended patch test is not still available.

Miscellaneous Structures

Examples of such natural products are Disulfides (Alliaceae), isothiocyanates (Cruciferae) and polyacetylenic derivates (Araliaceae, Apiaceae) are other types of natural products containing reactive functional groups which have been associated with skin allergies (Fig. 10).

Figure 10.

Miscellaneous chemical structures of plant sensitizers.


Alliaceae family members are widely distributed in temperate, subtropical and warm worldwide regions. The component species can be recognized easily by its characteristic odor (garlic odor) as well as soft, fleshy leaves. The genus Allium is the most important genus in dermatology and includes many important vegetables including garlic and onion. Garlic is the main species involved in cases of allergic contact dermatitis. Because of its multiple antibacterial, choleretic, spasmolytic and in particular demonstrated anti-atherosclerotic effect the plant was cultivated since ancient times in China, India and Egypt and its healing effects are used as folk medicine nowadays in many countries.

All parts of the plant, when damaged, release the potentially irritating and allergenic sap. Diallyl disulfide, allicin, and allyl propyl disulfide have been identified as the principal low molecular weight allergens.121 Allergic contact dermatitis is generally considered as being caused by diallyl disulfide.122

Occupational dermatitis has been frequently reported in the literature. The typical occupational gesture of cutting the bulb, which is held between the thumb and first/second finger of the non-dominant hand, while the knife is held in the dominant hand leads to the characteristic distribution of hyperkeratotic eczema on the tips of the first two or three fingers of the non-dominant hand and thumb of the dominant hand123–127 (Fig. 11). The hypersensitivity not always presents with this classical asymmetrical pulpitis, but frequently also as hand eczema (desquamation, fissuring and hyperkeratosis) involving the palm.

Figure 11.

Fingertip dermatitis after handling garlic.


Lesions at different locations from those of the typical hand eczema have also been described, reflecting a different pattern of exposure, especially after its use for medicinal purposes.128 Because of its sensitizing potential and their high degree of irritation (especially under occlusion), the use of garlic as a topical medicinal agent should be discouraged.

Other less typical presentations attributed to garlic include a pemphigus vulgaris-like eruption,123 cheilitis,122 a garlic induced systemic contact dermatitis,126,129 cases of photodermatitis130 and a occupational airborne ACD from garlic with concurrent type I allergy.131

Allergic contact dermatitis to onion is less well reported, however, patients with allergic contact dermatitis to onion can cross-react with garlic-sensitive individuals.132

Patch Test

Patch test has been performed either with 50% garlic/onion in arachis oil133 or diallyl disulfide 5% pet134 but actually 1% in pet (Chemotechnique diagnostics®, Malmö, Sweden) is the recommended concentration to be used.


Isocyanates are a family of highly reactive, low molecular weight compounds identified by the number of NCO (nitrogen–carbon–oxygen) groups they contain. Mono-isocyanates contain one group; di-isocyanates (used in polyurethane) contain two, and so on.

Mono-isothiocyanates otherwise known as mustard-oils, because they are characteristic of and were indeed first isolated from mustard plants (Cruciferae family), occur in a wide variety of higher plants, but above all in the Mustard Family and its tropical counterpart, the Caper family.

Several species of this families yield in their leaves, fruits, seeds and roots extracts, glucosidic precursors (glucosinolates), which, through enzymatic hydrolysis by an enzyme named myrosinase produced the isothiocyanates. Naturally occurring isothiocyanates can be either saturated or unsaturated.135 Instauration of the β,γ carbons to the isothiocyanate nitrogen (allyl and benzyl isothiocyanate) may make the thiocayante more immunologically reactive. Compounds with instauration at the (,( positions, such as phenylisothiocyanate, are probably less immunologically reactive and have a greater potential for irritation.

Cruciferae (Cabbage or Mustard Family, Brassicaceae) and Capparaceae Family

The Brassicacea family contains about 3200 species in 375 genera. It includes several important vegetables, such as cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.), cauliflower (B. oleracea L. v botrytis), radish (Raphanus sativus L.), horse radish (Armoracia rusticana P.Gaertn., B.Mey. & Scherb), turnip (Brassica campestris L.) and mustrard (Brassica nigra (L.) W.D.J. Koch). The Capparaceae, regarded as the tropical relative of the mustard family, comprises some 650 species of small trees and shrubs in 30 genera. The most important representative of this family is Capparis spinosa L., or caper bush, a shrub with grayish oval leaves and showy white-pink flowers with several prominent stamens that is better known for the edible bud and fruit which are usually consumed pickled.

Several species contain thioglucosides, which are broken down enzymatically, in the presence of water, to isothiocyanates, potent irritants, which appear to be also the most important allergens. Contact dermatitis from these plants can be both irritant and allergic,136,137 being its potential irritancy capacity high and its allergic contact dermatitis rare.

Allergic contact dermatitis is more commonly seen in food handlers. Raphanus sativus L. induced an acute vesiculo-bullous dermatitis of both palms in a waitress who chopped them.135 Cabbages provoked occupational contact dermatitis138 and cabbage juice can produce positive patch test reactions in patients with hand dermatitis suspected to have been caused by vegetables.139Brassica nigra induced an allergic contact dermatitis due to mustard powder in a salad maker137 and Brassica oleracea v. Botrytis (cauliflower) induced a hand eczema in a plant grower.140Capparis spinosa L. induced an acute vesiculo-bullous allergic contact dermatitis in a woman who applied a wet compress of the minced leaves and fruits to her arm.141

Patch test: Isothiocyanates present in these plants are usually primary irritants, and they can be tested at a concentration of 0.05% in petrolatum. As the irritancy of mustard oil tends to overshadow its allergic potential, positive patch test with mustard can be difficult to interpret.135

Polyacetylenic Derivates

The polyacetylenes are a group of chemically reactive and biologically active compounds with a carbon-carbon triple bond or alkynyl functional group. They can be found in seven families of plants, and the majority has been isolated from the closely related plant families Araliaceae and Apiaceae. The polyacetylenic derivatives of the Araliaceae and Apiaceae are mostly the aliphatic C17-polyacetylenes of the falcarinol-type, derived from oleic acid.142 They act as very reactive alkylating agents towards, for example, thiol groups in proteins, forming hapten-protein complexes (antigens).142,143


This family of some 700 species in 55 genera consists mostly of trees and shrubs, but includes some twiners. Most species occur in tropical regions, particularly in Indo-Malaysia and tropical America. Other species are native to temperate regions, and some species have become widely distributed by horticulture and as houseplants.

Perhaps the best known temperate specie is Hedera helix L., the common ivy. The plants are native to Europe, North Africa, and Asia but are now grown in many other countries. Three main subspecies are found in Europe, namely helix (English ivy), canariensis (Canary Island ivy) and poetarum. They are a family of evergreen climbing plants usually found scrambling over rocks an through hedges or climbing up trees or walls (Fig. 12).

Figure 12.

Hedera helix.


Falcarinol (heptadeca-1,9-diene-4,6-diyne-3-ol) and didehydrofalcarinol are the most important allergens. They are detected in stalks, leaves, and roots and may cause both irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. Falcarinol seems to be the stronger sensitizer and concentration and the ratio didehydrofalcarinol: falcarinol seems to varied considerably, depending on climate and other conditions of growth.144

Sensitization can occur through contact with plants to climb trees covered by them or by pruning or handling the plants in an occupational setting. Any site in contact with the plant may be affected and dermatitis commonly begins with an itching and erythema that in a few days develops into a vesicular eczema (Fig. 13).145 The most frequently affected sites are hands and forearms followed by involvement of the face and neck, however, involvement of trunk and legs as well as widespread dermatitis has also been reported.145,146 Urticarial-like dermatitis have also been reported.147 Immediate, possibly allergic, reactions from common ivy causing rhinitis and asthma have rarely been reported, The majority of mucosal symptoms in gardeners are probably irritant, perhaps caused by hederin.148–150

Figure 13.

Symmetrical erythematous patches after contact with Hedera helix.

Patch Test

Testing the plant material “as is” as well as extracts of these carries the risk of false positive reactions. Falcarinol 0.03% and didehydrofalcarinol 0.3% in petrolatum was and can be used.


Also known as the Umbelliferae, this family of 2850 species in 275 genera is of cosmopolitan distribution but is found mainly in north temperate regions. Most of the species of dermatological importance are similar in floral structure with cluster of flowers on stalks of roughly equal length arising from a single point as an umbrella structure. Most of the members of this family have been shown to be rich in psoralenes and therefore produced phototoxic reactions. Some ornamental plants and weeds as well as edible plants of this family have also been related to allergic contact dermatitis. Two important species in dermatology are Centella asiatica and Daucus carota vars.

Centella asiatica

Centella asiatica formerly named Hydrocotyle asiatica (L.) Urban, is a small herbaceous annual plant of the subfamily Mackinlayoideae of family Apiaceae. It is native to India, Sri Lanka, northern Australia, Indonesia, and other parts of Asia. The fresh and dried leaves as well as the stems of this species have been widely used topically in many medical and dermatological conditions for example on scars and keloids, in plastic surgery, scleroderma, phlebology, slow-healing wounds and chronic leg ulcers among others.151–155

Several topical preparations have been formulated including Blastoestimulina™, Centelase™, Collaven ™, Emdecassol ™, Madecassol™, Marticassol™, and Trofolastin™. Contact allergy to the Centella asiatica extract demonstrated by patch testing has been reported with the topical use of Madecassol™,156 Centelase™157–159 and Blastoestimulina™.160–164 The potential allergens are madecassic acid, asiatic acid and asiaticoside, three triterpenic acids of high molecular weight and low sensitizing capacity.165

Daucus carota vars

Daucus carota, the carrot, is a root vegetable of usually orange color, though purple, red, white, and yellow varieties exist. In early use, carrots were grown for their aromatic leaves and seeds, but is now cultivated mainly for food.

Allergic contact dermatitis from carrot is well recognized particularly affecting employees working in canning factories.139,166–168 Leaves and fruits contains falcarinol, an allergen also present in celery (Apium graveolens L.) and common ivy (Hedera helix L.).168 Hand or fingertip dermatitis is the typical clinical pattern, but involvement of the face has also been reported.169

Patch test: If the oleoresin of carrots is not available for testing, patch test may be performed with the external surface of an unpeeled raw carrot or with the surface of a slice of carrot.

Available Resources to Patch Test Plants

Currently we have a limited availability of commercial test materials for patch testing plants.

The European baseline series include de sesquiterpene lactone mix at 0.1% in petrolatum for Compositae and Frullania and the primin at 0.01% in petrolatum for Primulaceae. In contrast, the American baseline series include the Sesquiterpene lactone mix at 0.1% and the Compositae mix at 6% in petrolatum for Compositae and Frullania.

Special plant series for testing Compositae, Frullania, Liliaceae, Alstroemeriacea, Alliaceae and the Citrus genus can be purchased from different European and American suppliers. Table 2 summarizes the currently available allergens. Commercial patch test material for Anacardiaceae, Cruciferae, Capparaceae, Ginkgoaceae, Araliaceae and Apiaceae are not available.

Table 2.

Available allergens to patch test plants.

  Allergen  Family or Specie 
European baseline seriesSesquiterpene lactone mix 0.1 pet  Compositea and Frullania 
Primin 0.01 pet  Primulaceae 
American baseline seriesSesquiterpene lactone mix 0.1 pet  Compositae and Frullania 
Compositae mix 6 pet  Compositae and Frullania 
Special series
Chamomilla romana  Chamomilla Romana 1.0 peta  Chamomilla romana 
Árnica montana  Árnica montana 0.5 peta  Árnica montana 
Taraxacum officinale  Taraxacum Officinale 2.5 peta  Taraxacum officinale 
Achillea millefolium  Achillea Millefolium 1.0 peta  Achillea millefolium 
Chrysanthemum parthenium  Chrysanthemum Parthenium 1.0 peta  Chrysanthemum parthenium (Feverfew) 
Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium  Chrysanthemum Cinerariaefolium 1.0 peta  Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium 
Tanacetum vulgare  Tanacetum Vulgare 1.0 peta  Tanacetum vulgare 
Alantolactone  Alantolactone 0.033 peta  Compositae 
Parthenolide  Parthenolide 0.1 peta  Feverfew several Compositae and Magnoliaceae 
Dipentene (limonene)  Dipentene (Limonene) 1.0 peta, 2%vasb, 2% petc, 2%e  Citrus genus 
Diallyldisulfide 1.0 pet  Diallyldisulfide 1.0 peta, vasb, petc,e  Garlic 
α-Methylene-γ-butyrolactone (tulipalin A)  α-Methylene-γ-butyrolactone 0.01 peta  Liliaceae and Alstroemeria 
Oil of bergamot  Oil of bergamot 2% vasb, petc  Bergamot 
Oil of lemon  Oil of lemon 2% vasb, petc,e  Lemon 
Orange oil  Orange oil 2%e  Orange 
Primin  Primin 0.01 peta, vasb, petc,e  Primula obconica 
Geraniol  Geraniol 1% peta, vasb, petc,e  Lemon, Orange, Bergamot 



Marti Tor.




We can confirm that many times the study of a concrete plant induced contact dermatitis and photocontact dermatitis needs an accurate research into the published literature. The previous experience developed by our colleagues will help us to avoid unnecessary steps and to create more useful research protocols.

Conclusions and Further Research

This review intent covers some of the essential aspects of the allergic contact dermatitis induced by plants. The chemical approach presented here intended to allow a more rational understanding to the presently confusing cross-reactions between apparently unrelated genera. Plants contact dermatitis tends to be underestimated and misdiagnoses. We lack of definitive patch test material and often the diagnosis lies over an individualized approach with the own material involved. Plants induced contact and photocontact dermatitis can be severe and the basis from the development of other inflammatory skin diseases as chronic actinic dermatosis. Just the recognition of the problem will help to find the trigger and the development of preventive measures.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

J.C. Mitchell, G. Dupuis.
Allergic contact dermatitis from sesquiterpenoids of the Compositae family of plants.
Br J Dermatol, 84 (1971), pp. 139-150
H. Mensing, W. Kimmig, B.M. Hausen.
Airborne contact dermatitis.
Hautarzt, 36 (1985), pp. 398-402
J. Menz, R.K. Winkelmann.
Sensitivity to wild vegetation.
Contact Dermat, 16 (1987), pp. 169-173
J. Arlette, J.C. Mitchell.
Compositae dermatitis. Current aspects.
Contact Dermat, 7 (1981), pp. 129-136
J.D. Guin, D. Phillips.
Erythroderma from systemic contact dermatitis: a complication of systemic gentamicin in a patient with contact allergy to neomycin.
Cutis, 43 (1989), pp. 564-567
E. Paulsen.
Compositae dermatitis: a survey.
Contact Dermat, 26 (1992), pp. 76-86
L.A. Gordon.
Compositae dermatitis.
Australas J Dermatol, 40 (1999), pp. 123-128
S. Epstein.
Role of dermal sensitivity in ragweed contact dermatitis.
Arch Dermatol, 82 (1960), pp. 48-55
N. Hjorth, J. Roed-Petersen, K. Thomsen.
Airborne contact dermatitis from Compsoitae oleoresins simulating photodermatitis.
Br J Dermatol, 95 (1976), pp. 613-620
C. Le Coz, G. Ducombs.
Plants and plant products.
Contact dermatitis, 4th ed.,
J.N. Burry, J.G. Reid, J. Kirk.
Australian bush dermatitis.
Contact Dermat, 1 (1975), pp. 263-264
J.N. Burry, R. Kuchel, J.G. Reid, J. Kirk.
Australian bush dermatitis: compositae dermatitis in South Australia.
Med J Aust, 1 (1973), pp. 110-116
V.K. Sharma, G. Sethuraman.
Parthenium dermatitis.
Dermatitis, 18 (2007), pp. 183-190
C. Lakshmi, C.R. Srinivas.
Type I hypersensitivity to Parthenium hysterophorus in patients with parthenium dermatitis.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 73 (2007), pp. 103-105
J.D. Guin, G. Skidmore.
Compositae dermatitis in childhood.
Arch Dermatol, 123 (1987), pp. 500-502
A. Lonkar, J.C. Mitchell, C.D. Calnan.
Contact dermatitis from Parthenium hysterophorus.
Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc, 60 (1974), pp. 43-53
G. Ducombs, C. Benezra, P. Talaga, K.E. Andersen, D. Burrows, J.G. Camarasa, et al.
Patch testing with the “sesquiterpene lactone mix”: a marker for contact allergy to Compositae and other sesquiterpene-lactone-containing plants. A multicentre study of the EECDRG.
Contact Dermat, 22 (1990), pp. 249-252
S. Oliwiecki, M.H. Beck, B.M. Hausen.
Compositae dermatitis aggravated by eating lettuce.
Contact Dermat, 24 (1991), pp. 318-319
K.W. Shum, J.S. English.
Allergic contact dermatitis in food handlers, with patch tests positive to Compositae mix but negative to sesquiterpene lactone mix.
Contact Dermat, 39 (1998), pp. 207-208
M. Rodriguez-Serna, J.M. Sanchez-Motilla, R. Ramon, A. Aliaga.
Allergic and systemic contact dermatitis from Matricaria chamomilla tea.
Contact Dermat, 39 (1998), pp. 192-193
G. Krook.
Occupational dermatitis from Lactuca sativa (lettuce) and Cichorium (endive). Simultaneous occurrence of immediate and delayed allergy as a cause of contact dermatitis.
Contact Dermat, 3 (1977), pp. 27-36
M. Jovanovic, N. Mimica-Dukic, M. Poljacki, P. Boza.
Erythema multiforme due to contact with weeds: a recurrence after patch testing.
Contact Dermat, 48 (2003), pp. 17-25
H. Menage, J.S. Ross, P.G. Norris, J.L. Hawk, I.R. White.
Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis: sesquiterpene lactone mix is an important allergen.
Br J Dermatol, 132 (1995), pp. 543-547
E. Paulsen, K.E. Andersen, B.M. Hausen.
Sensitization and cross-reaction patterns in Danish Compositae-allergic patients.
Contact Dermat, 45 (2001), pp. 197-204
C. Green, J. Ferguson.
Sesquiterpene lactone mix is not an adequate screen for Compositae allergy.
Contact Dermat, 31 (1994), pp. 151-153
L. Kanerva, T. Estlander, K. Alanko, R. Jolanki.
Patch test sensitization to Compositae mix, sesquiterpene-lactone mix, Compositae extracts, laurel leaf, Chlorophorin, Mansonone A, and dimethoxydalbergione.
Am J Contact Dermat, 12 (2001), pp. 18-24
B.M. Hausen.
A 6-year experience with compositae mix.
Am J Contact Dermat, 7 (1996), pp. 94-99
J.P. Lepoittevin, R. Tomb.
Sesquiterpene lactone mix is not an adequate screen for Compositae allergy.
Contact Dermat, 32 (1995), pp. 254
S.M. Wilkinson, B. Pollock.
Patch test sensitization after use of the Compositae mix.
Contact Dermat, 40 (1999), pp. 277-278
V. Goulden, S.M. Wilkinson.
Patch testing for Compositae allergy.
Br J Dermatol, 138 (1998), pp. 1018-1021
R.J. Schmidt, T. Kingston.
Chrysanthemum dermatitis in South Wales; diagnosis by patch testing with feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium) extract.
Contact Dermat, 13 (1985), pp. 120-121
J.C. Mitchell, B. Fritig, B. Singh, G.H. Towers.
Allergic contact dermatitis from Frullania and Compositae. The role of sesquiterpene lactones.
J Invest Dermatol, 54 (1970), pp. 233-239
H. Knoche, G. Ourisson, G.W. Perold, J. Foussereau, J. Maleville.
Allergenic component of a liverwort: a sesquiterpene lactone.
Science, 166 (1969), pp. 239-240
R.R. Tomb.
Patch testing with frullania during a 10-year period: hazards and complications.
Contact Dermat, 26 (1992), pp. 220-223
J. Foussereau, J.C. Muller, C. Benezra.
Contact allergy to Frullania and Laurus Nobilis: cross-sensitization and chemical structure of the allergens.
Contact Dermat, 1 (1975), pp. 223-230
C. Benezra, J.L. Stampf, P. Barbier, G. Ducombs.
Enantiospecificity in allergic contact dermatitis. A review and new results in Frullania-sensitive patients.
Contact Dermat, 13 (1985), pp. 110-114
P. Barbier, C. Benezra.
Stereospecificity of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) induced by two natural enantiomers (+)- and (−)-frullanolides, in guinea pigs.
Naturwissenschaften, 69 (1982), pp. 296-297
L. Fernandez de Corres, J.L. Corrales Torres.
Contact dermatitis by Frullania dilatata (L) Dum.
Allergol Immunopathol, 4 (1976), pp. 229-234
G. Ducombs, J.P. Lepoittevin, V. Berl, K.E. Andersen, F.M. Brandao, D.P. Bruynzeel, et al.
Routine patch testing with frullanolide mix: an European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group multicentre study.
Contact Dermat, 48 (2003), pp. 158-161
S. Goncalo.
Contact sensitivity to lichens and compositae in Frullania dermatitis.
Contact Dermat, 16 (1987), pp. 84-86
J.C. Mitchell.
Allergic contact dermatitis from Hedera helix and Brassaia actinophylla (Araliaceae).
Contact Dermat, 7 (1981), pp. 158-159
L. Fernandez de Corres.
Contact dermatitis from Frullania. Compositae and other plants.
Contact Dermat, 11 (1984), pp. 74-79
G.A. Mijnssen.
Pathogenesis and causative agent of “tulip finger”.
Br J Dermatol, 81 (1969), pp. 737-745
P. Barbier, C. Benezra.
Allergenic alpha-methylene-gamma-butyrolactones. Study of the capacity of beta-acetoxy- and beta-hydroxy-alpha-methylene-gamma-butyrolactones to induce allergic contact dermatitis in guinea pigs.
J Med Chem, 29 (1986), pp. 868-871
B.M. Hausen.
Airborne contact dermatitis caused by tulip bulbs.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 7 (1982), pp. 500-503
M.T. Gette, J.E. Marks Jr..
Tulip fingers.
Arch Dermatol, 126 (1990), pp. 203-205
W.P. van der.
Occupational diseases among workers in the bulb industries.
Acta Allergol, 14 (1959), pp. 338-355
I.A. van der Mei, E.M. de Boer, D.P. Bruynzeel.
Contact dermatitis in Alstroemeria workers.
Occup Med, 48 (1998), pp. 397-404
A. Rook.
Dermatitis from Alstroemeria: altered clinical pattern and probable increasing incidence.
Contact Dermat, 7 (1981), pp. 355-356
F.J. Ortiz de Frutos, J.G. Álvarez Fernández, D. Sánchez Mata, A. Guerra-Tapia, L. Iglesias Díez.
Eczema alérgico de contacto profesional por Alstroemeria ligtu L.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 90 (1999), pp. 113-116
B. Santucci, M. Picardo, C. Iavarone, C. Trogolo.
Contact dermatitis to Alstroemeria.
Contact Dermat, 12 (1985), pp. 215-219
T.W. McGovern.
Alstroemeria L. (Peruvian lily).
Am J Contact Dermat, 10 (1999), pp. 172-176
J.H. Apted.
Contact dermatitis due to Alstroemeria (Peruvian lily).
Australas J Dermatol, 31 (1990), pp. 111-113
R.M. Adams, A.D. Daily, R.R. Brancaccio, I.P. Dhillon, E.C. Gendler.
Alstroemeria. A new and potent allergen for florists.
Dermatol Clin, 8 (1990), pp. 73-76
J.G. Marks Jr..
Allergic contact dermatitis to Alstroemeria.
Arch Dermatol, 124 (1988), pp. 914-916
R. Illuminati, R. Russo, L. Guerra, M. Melino.
Occupational airborne contact dermatitis in a florist.
Contact Dermat, 18 (1988), pp. 246
B.E. Bjorkner.
Contact allergy and depigmentation from alstroemeria.
Contact Dermat, 8 (1982), pp. 178-184
B.M. Hausen, E. Prater, H. Schubert.
The sensitizing capacity of Alstroemeria cultivars in man and guinea pig. Remarks on the occurrence, quantity and irritant and sensitizing potency of their constituents tuliposide A and tulipalin A (alpha-methylene-gamma-butyrolactone).
Contact Dermat, 9 (1983), pp. 46-54
N. Hjorth, D.S. Wilkinson.
Contact dermatitis IV. Tulip fingers, hyacinth itch and lily rash.
Br J Dermatol, 80 (1968), pp. 696-698
R.J. Rycroft, C.D. Calnan.
Alstroemeria dermatitis.
Contact Dermat, 7 (1981), pp. 284
G. Schlewer, J.L. Stampf, C. Benezra.
Synthesis of alpha-methylene-gamma-butyrolactones: a structure-activity relationship study of their allergenic power.
J Med Chem, 23 (1980), pp. 1031-1038
J.P. Lepoittevin, C. Benezra.
Allergic contact dermatitis caused by naturally occurring quinones.
Pharm Weekbl Sci, 13 (1991), pp. 119-122
A.A. Fisher.
Poison ivy/oak dermatitis. Part I: Prevention—soap and water, topical barriers, hyposensitization.
Cutis, 57 (1996), pp. 384-386
A.C. Gladman.
Toxicodendron dermatitis: poison ivy, oak, and sumac.
Wilderness Environ Med, 17 (2006), pp. 120-128
T.W. McGovern, S.R. LaWarre, C. Brunette.
Is it, or isn’t it?. Poison ivy look-a-likes.
Am J Contact Dermat, 11 (2000), pp. 104-110
A.A. Fisher, J.C. Mitchell.
Toxicodendron plants and spices.
Fisher's contact dermatitis, 4th ed., pp. 461-523
J.C. Craig, C.W. Waller, S. Billets, M.A. Elsohly.
New GLC analysis of urushiol congeners in different plant parts of poison ivy, Toxicodendron radicans.
J Pharm Sci, 67 (1978), pp. 483-485
T.L. Tanner.
Rhus (Toxicodendron) dermatitis.
Prim Care, 27 (2000), pp. 493-502
A.E. Werchniak, K. Schwarzenberger.
Poison ivy: an underreported cause of erythema multiforme.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 51 (2004), pp. S159-S160
Y.M. Park, J.G. Park, H. Kang, D. Houh, D.G. Byun, J.W. Kim.
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by ingestion of lacquer chicken.
Br J Dermatol, 143 (2000), pp. 230-232
K.B. Devich, J.C. Lee, W.L. Epstein, L.E. Spitler, J. Hopper Jr..
Renal lesions accompanying poison oak dermatitis.
Clin Nephrol, 3 (1975), pp. 106-113
J.G. Kurlan, A.W. Lucky.
Black spot poison ivy: a report of 5 cases and a review of the literature.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 45 (2001), pp. 246-249
C. Le Coz, G. Ducombs.
Plants and plant products.
Contact dermatitis, 4th ed.,
K. Oka, F. Saito, T. Yasuhara, A. Sugimoto.
A study of cross-reactions between mango contact allergens and urushiol.
Contact Dermat, 51 (2004), pp. 292-296
C.H. Thoo, S. Freeman.
Hypersensitivity reaction to the ingestion of mango flesh.
Australas J Dermatol, 49 (2008), pp. 116-119
K.F. Lampe.
Dermatitis-producing Anacardiaceae of the Caribbean area.
Clin Dermatol, 4 (1986), pp. 171-182
A. Hirao, N. Oiso, H. Matsuda, S. Kawara, A. Kawada.
Occupational allergic contact dermatitis due to cashew nut oil.
Contact Dermat, 59 (2008), pp. 131-132
T. Rosen, D.B. Fordice.
Cashew nut dermatitis.
South Med J, 87 (1994), pp. 543-546
T.K. Hamilton, K.A. Zug.
Systemic contact dermatitis to raw cashew nuts in a pesto sauce.
Am J Contact Dermat, 9 (1998), pp. 51-54
L. Orris.
Cashew nut dermatitis.
N Y State J Med, 58 (1958), pp. 2799-2800
J.G. Marks Jr., T. DeMelfi, M.A. McCarthy, E.J. Witte, N. Castagnoli, W.L. Epstein, et al.
Dermatitis from cashew nuts.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 10 (1984), pp. 627-631
S. Fukushima, M. Kidou, H. Ihn.
Fixed food eruption caused by cashew nut.
Allergol Int, 57 (2008), pp. 285-287
H. Keil, D. Wasserman, C.R. Dawson.
The relation of hypersensitiveness to poison ivy and to the pure ingredients in cashew nut shell liquid and related substances.
Ind Med Surg, 14 (1945), pp. 825-830
H. Keil, D. Wasserman, C.R. Dawson.
Mango dermatitis and its relationship to poison ivy hypersensitivity.
Ann Allergy, 4 (1946), pp. 268-281
K. Kawai, M. Nakagawa, T. Miyakoshi, K. Miyashita, T. Asami.
Heat treatment of Japanese lacquerware renders it hypoallergenic.
Contact Dermat, 27 (1992), pp. 244-249
J.B. Howell.
Cross-sensitization in diverse poisonous members of the sumac family (anacardiaceae).
J Invest Dermatol, 32 (1959), pp. 21-25
D.L. Roberts.
An outbreak of contact dermatitis from Japanese lacquer tree.
Contact Dermat, 37 (1997), pp. 237
S.M. Powell, D.K. Barrett.
An outbreak of contact dermatitis from Rhus verniciflua (Toxicodendron vernicifluum).
Contact Dermat, 14 (1986), pp. 288-289
E. Koch, H. Jaggy, S.S. Chatterjee.
Evidence for immunotoxic effects of crude Ginkgo biloba L. leaf extracts using the popliteal lymph node assay in the mouse.
Int J Immunopharmacol, 22 (2000), pp. 229-236
T. Nakamura.
Ginkgo tree dermatitis.
Contact Dermat, 12 (1985), pp. 281-282
L.E. Becker, G.B. Skipworth.
Ginkgo- tree dermatitis, stomatitis, and proctitis.
JAMA, 231 (1975), pp. 1162-1163
W.F. Sowers, P.E. Weary, O.D. Collins, E.P. Cawley.
Ginkgo-tree dermatitis.
Arch Dermatol, 91 (1965), pp. 452-456
J.P. Lepoittevin, C. Benezra, Y. Asakawa.
Allergic contact dermatitis to Ginkgo biloba L.: relationship with urushiol.
Arch Dermatol Res, 281 (1989), pp. 227-230
N. Lothian.
Grevillea species and hybrids causing contact dermatitis.
Australas J Dermatol, 30 (1989), pp. 111-113
D.K. Cook, S. Freeman.
Allergic contact dermatitis to plants: an analysis of 68 patients tested at the Skin and Cancer Foundation.
Australas J Dermatol, 38 (1997), pp. 129-131
J. Menz, E.R. Rossi, W.C. Taylor, L. Wall.
Contact dermatitis from Grevillea ‘Robyn Gordon’.
Contact Dermat, 15 (1986), pp. 126-131
T.E. Hoffman, B.M. Hausen, R.M. Adams.
Allergic contact dermatitis to “silver oak” wooden arm bracelets.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 13 (1985), pp. 778-779
S.B. May.
Dermatitis due to Grevillea robusta (Australian silk oak). Report of a case.
Arch Dermatol, 82 (1960), pp. 1006
M. Connolly, J. Mc Cune, E. Dauncey, C.R. Lovell.
Primula obconica—is contact allergy on the decline?.
Contact Dermat, 51 (2004), pp. 167-171
C. Aplin, R. Tan, C. Lovell.
Allergic contact dermatitis from Primula auricula and Primula denticulata.
Contact Dermat, 42 (2000), pp. 48
A. Dooms-Goossens, G. Biesemans, M. Vandaele, H. Degreef.
Primula dermatitis: more than one allergen?.
Contact Dermat, 21 (1989), pp. 122-124
B.M. Hausen.
On the occurrence of the contact allergen primin and other quinoid compounds in species of the family of primulaceae.
Arch Dermatol Res, 261 (1978), pp. 311-321
B.M. Hausen, H.W. Schmalle, D. Marshall, R.H. Thomson.
5,8-Dihydroxyflavone (primetin) the contact sensitizer of Primula mistassinica Michaux.
Arch Dermatol Res, 275 (1983), pp. 365-370
M. Krebs, L.P. Christensen.
2-Methoxy-6-pentyl-1,4-dihydroxybenzene (miconidin) from Primula obconica: a possible allergen?.
Contact Dermat, 33 (1995), pp. 90-93
L.P. Christensen, E. Larsen.
Direct emission of the allergen primin from intact Primula obconica plants.
Contact Dermat, 42 (2000), pp. 149-153
A. Ingber, T. Menne.
Primin standard patch testing: 5 years experience.
Contact Dermat, 23 (1990), pp. 15-19
L. Fernandez de Corres, I. Leanizbarrutia, D. Munoz, G. Bernaola, E. Fernandez.
Contact dermatitis from a neighbour's primula.
Contact Dermat, 16 (1987), pp. 234-235
K. Lapiere, L. Matthieu, L. Meuleman, J. Lambert.
Primula dermatitis mimicking lichen planus.
Contact Dermat, 44 (2001), pp. 199
F. Lengrand, A.S. Tellart, M. Segard, Y. Dejobert, P. Thomas.
Erythema multiforme-like eruption: an unusual presentation of primula contact allergy.
Contact Dermat, 44 (2001), pp. 35
N. Hjorth.
Primula dermatitis. Sources of errors in patch testing and patch test sensitization.
Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc, 52 (1966), pp. 207-219
A. Virgili, M. Corazza.
Unusual primin dermatitis.
Contact Dermat, 24 (1991), pp. 63-64
R. Gallo, S. Sorbara, F. Rongioletti.
Contact erythema multiforme from Primula obconica.
Contact Dermat, 53 (2005), pp. 351-352
D. Bonamonte, R. Filotico, V. Mastrandrea, C. Foti, G. Angelini.
Erythema multiforme-like contact dermatitis from primin.
Contact Dermat, 59 (2008), pp. 174-176
A. Rook, H.T. Wilson.
Primula dermatitis.
Br Med J, 1 (1965), pp. 220-222
E. Epstein.
Primula contact dermatitis: an easily overlooked diagnosis.
Cutis, 45 (1990), pp. 411-416
K.F. Thomson, R. Charles-Holmes, M.H. Beck.
Primula dermatitis mimicking herpes simplex.
Contact Dermat, 37 (1997), pp. 185-186
M. Bhushan, M.H. Beck.
Allergic contact dermatitis from primula presenting as vitiligo.
Contact Dermat, 41 (1999), pp. 292-293
L.P. Christensen, E. Larsen.
Primin-free Primula obconica plants available.
Contact Dermat, 43 (2000), pp. 45-46
L. Schwartz.
Diagnosis of industrial skin diseases.
Am J Public Health Nations Health, 28 (1938), pp. 593-598
A.C. Cardullo, A.M. Ruszkowski, V.A. DeLeo.
Allergic contact dermatitis resulting from sensitivity to citrus peel, geraniol, and citral.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 21 (1989), pp. 395-397
C. Papageorgiou, J.P. Corbet, F. Menezes-Brandao, M. Pecegueiro, C. Benezra.
Allergic contact dermatitis to garlic (Allium sativum L.). Identification of the allergens: the role of mono-, di-, and trisulfides present in garlic. A comparative study in man and animal (guinea-pig).
Arch Dermatol Res, 275 (1983), pp. 229-234
A.L. Ekeowa-Anderson, B. Shergill, P. Goldsmith.
Allergic contact cheilitis to garlic.
Contact Dermat, 56 (2007), pp. 174-175
U. Jappe, B. Bonnekoh, B.M. Hausen, H. Gollnick.
Garlic-related dermatoses: case report and review of the literature.
Am J Contact Dermat, 10 (1999), pp. 37-39
J.M. Fernandez-Vozmediano, J.C. Armario-Hita, A. Manrique-Plaza.
Allergic contact dermatitis from diallyl disulfide.
Contact Dermat, 42 (2000), pp. 108-109
M. Cabanillas, V. Fernandez-Redondo, J. Toribio.
Allergic contact dermatitis to plants in a Spanish dermatology department: a 7-year review.
Contact Dermat, 55 (2006), pp. 84-91
F. Pereira, M. Hatia, J. Cardoso.
Systemic contact dermatitis from diallyl disulfide.
Contact Dermat, 46 (2002), pp. 124
T.M. Hughes, S. Varma, N.M. Stone.
Occupational contact dermatitis from a garlic and herb mixture.
Contact Dermat, 47 (2002), pp. 48
F. Urbina, M. Sudy.
Dermatitis de contacto por ajo usado con fines medicinales.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 92 (2001), pp. 109-111
S.A. Eming, J.O. Piontek, N. Hunzelmann, H. Rasokat, K. Scharffetter-Kachanek.
Severe toxic contact dermatitis caused by garlic.
Br J Dermatol, 141 (1999), pp. 391-392
M.S. Alvarez, S. Jacobs, S.B. Jiang, R.R. Brancaccio, N.A. Soter, D.E. Cohen.
Photocontact allergy to diallyl disulfide.
Am J Contact Dermat, 14 (2003), pp. 161-165
K. Bassioukas, D. Orton, R. Cerio.
Occupational airborne allergic contact dermatitis from garlic with concurrent Type I allergy.
Contact Dermat, 50 (2004), pp. 39-41
E. Bleumink, H.M. Doeglas, A.H. Klokke, J.P. Nater.
Allergic contact dermatitis to garlic.
Br J Dermatol, 87 (1972), pp. 6-9
E. Cronin.
Dermatitis of the hands in caterers.
Contact Dermat, 17 (1987), pp. 265-269
N. Hjorth, J. Roed-Petersen.
Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handlers.
Contact Dermat, 2 (1976), pp. 28-42
J.C. Mitchell.
Contact dermatitis from plants of the caper family. Capparidaceae. Effects on the skin of some plants which yield isothiocyanates.
Br J Dermatol, 91 (1974), pp. 13-20
L.E. Gaul.
Contact dermatitis from synthetic oil of mustard.
Arch Dermatol, 90 (1964), pp. 158-159
C.J. Dannaker, I.R. White.
Cutaneous allergy to mustard in a salad maker.
Contact Dermat, 16 (1987), pp. 212-214
A. Leoni, R. Cogo.
Occupational dermatitis due to contact with cabbage.
Minerva Dermatol, 39 (1964), pp. 326-327
S.M. Sinha, J.S. Pasricha, R. Sharma, K.C. Kandhari.
Vegetables responsible for contact dermatitis of the hands.
Arch Dermatol, 113 (1977), pp. 776-779
W.G. van Ketel.
A cauliflower allergy.
Contact Dermat, 1 (1975), pp. 324-325
G. Angelini, G.A. Vena, R. Filotico, C. Foti, M. Grandolfo.
Allergic contact dermatitis from Capparis spinosa L. applied as wet compresses.
Contact Dermat, 24 (1991), pp. 382-383
L.P. Christensen, K. Brandt.
Bioactive polyacetylenes in food plants of the Apiaceae family: occurrence, bioactivity and analysis.
J Pharm Biomed Anal, 41 (2006), pp. 683-693
S. Purup, E. Larsen, L.P. Christensen.
Differential effects of falcarinol and related aliphatic C(17)-polyacetylenes on intestinal cell proliferation.
J Agric Food Chem, 57 (2009), pp. 8290-8296
B.M. Hausen, J. Brohan, W.A. Konig, H. Faasch, H. Hahn, G. Bruhn.
Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis from falcarinol and didehydrofalcarinol in common ivy (Hedera helix L.).
Contact Dermat, 17 (1987), pp. 1-9
E. Paulsen, L.P. Christensen, K.E. Andersen.
Dermatitis from common ivy (Hedera helix L. subsp. helix) in Europe: past, present, and future.
Contact Dermat, 62 (2010), pp. 201-209
P.D. Yesudian, A. Franks.
Contact dermatitis from Hedera helix in a husband and wife.
Contact Dermat, 46 (2002), pp. 125-126
H. Thormann, E. Paulsen.
Contact urticaria to common ivy (Hedera helix cv. ‘Hester’) with concomitant immediate sensitivity to the labiate family (Lamiaceae) in a Danish gardener.
Contact Dermat, 59 (2008), pp. 179-180
E. Jors.
The prevalence of skin and mucosal symptoms in gardeners handling Ficus benjamina (weeping fig) and Hedera helix (ivy). A cross-sectional study.
Ugeskr Laeger, 165 (2003), pp. 3526-3529
T. Hannu, P. Kauppi, M. Tuppurainen, P. Piirila.
Occupational asthma to ivy (Hedera helix).
V. Mahillon, S. Saussez, O. Michel.
High incidence of sensitization to ornamental plants in allergic rhinitis.
B.M. Hausen.
Centella asiatica (Indian pennywort), an effective therapeutic but a weak sensitizer.
Contact Dermat, 29 (1993), pp. 175-179
C. Bourde, J. Bourde.
Leg ulcers: modern and old biased therapeutic concepts. Place of cicatrical medications.
Sem Hop Ther Paris, 39 (1963), pp. 105-113
R. Labeye.
Use of asiaticoside in radiotherapy.
Ann Radiol, 5 (1962), pp. 891-894
O.D. Laerum, O.H. Iversen.
Reticuloses and epidermal tumors in hairless mice after topical skin applications of cantharidin and asiaticoside.
Cancer Res, 32 (1972), pp. 1463-1469
J.C. Lawrence.
The effect of asiaticoside on guinea pig skin.
J Invest Dermatol, 49 (1967), pp. 95-96
H.C. Eun, A.Y. Lee.
Contact dermatitis due to madecassol.
Contact Dermat, 13 (1985), pp. 310-313
B. Santucci, M. Picardo, A. Cristaudo.
Contact dermatitis due to Centelase.
Contact Dermat, 13 (1985), pp. 39
G.A. Vena, G. Angelini.
Contact allergy to Centelase.
Contact Dermat, 15 (1986), pp. 108-109
P. Danese, C. Carnevali, M.G. Bertazzoni.
Allergic contact dermatitis due to Centella asiatica extract.
Contact Dermat, 31 (1994), pp. 201
R. Izu, A. Aguirre, N. Gil, J.L. Diaz-Perez.
Allergic contact dermatitis from a cream containing Centella asiatica extract.
Contact Dermat, 26 (1992), pp. 192-193
A. Aguirre, J. Gardeazabal, R. Izu, J.A. Raton, J.L. Diaz-Perez.
Allergic contact dermatitis due to plant extracts in a multisensitized patient.
Contact Dermat, 28 (1993), pp. 186-187
I. Bilbao, A. Aguirre, R. Zabala, R. Gonzalez, J. Raton, J.L. Diaz Perez.
Allergic contact dermatitis from butoxyethyl nicotinic acid and Centella asiatica extract.
Contact Dermat, 33 (1995), pp. 435-436
M.A. Gonzalo Garijo, F. Revenga Arranz, P. Bobadilla Gonzalez.
Allergic contact dermatitis due to Centella asiatica: a new case.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr), 24 (1996), pp. 132-134
J.M. Oleaga-Morante, J.J. Goday Bujuan, M. Gonzalez-Güemes, I. Yanguas-Bayona, R. Soloeta-Arechavala.
Dermatitis alérgica de contacto por extracto de Centella asiática: aportación de un nuevo caso.
Actas Dermatosifiliogr, 89 (1998), pp. 314-322
C. Huriez, P. Martin.
Contact allergy to asiaticoside. Preliminary note.
G Ital Dermatol Minerva Dermatol, 44 (1969), pp. 463-464
J.M. Kimmich, J.V. Klauder.
Sensitization dermatitis to carrots; report of cross-sensitization phenomenon and remarks on phytophotodermatitis.
AMA Arch Dermatol, 74 (1956), pp. 149-158
L. Kanerva, T. Estlander, R. Jolanki.
Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from spices.
Contact Dermat, 35 (1996), pp. 157-162
L. Hansen, O. Hammershoy, P.M. Boll.
Allergic contact dermatitis from falcarinol isolated from Schefflera arboricola.
Contact Dermat, 14 (1986), pp. 91-93
S.R. Murdoch, J. Dempster.
Allergic contact dermatitis from carrot.
Contact Dermat, 42 (2000), pp. 236
Copyright © 2011. Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas

Suscríbase a la newsletter

Opciones de artículo
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?