Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major multiple organ complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and skin involvement is associated with substantial mortality, morbidity and reduction in quality of life. However, more than half of patients are refractory to current first-line therapy and there is till a lack of high-level evidence regarding alternative therapeutic agents. This systematic review was conducted by two independent reviewers who searched and screened records published from database inception to May 2024 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, using prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria aligned with the study objective. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence of trials eligible for review. Seven randomized controlled trials of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) with standard therapy, imatinib, entospletinib with prednisone, ruxolitinib, and ibrutinib with prednisone were eligible for inclusion. Ruxolitinib demonstrated superiority vs standard therapy and placebo with an overall response rate of 41.5% and a reduction in body surface area affected from 14.5% down to 6.2%. No other treatments conferred a statistically significant benefit vs standard therapy or placebo. Entospletinib was markedly inferior to placebo. Although all 7 trials demonstrated some risk of bias, they were found to have a moderate-to-high quality of evidence. In conclusion, of all therapeutic agents reviewed, only ruxolitinib demonstrated high-level evidence of a modest efficacy in treating cutaneous cGVHD and should be considered as a line of therapy in addition to current first-line therapy. Further high-level studies are needed to identify alternative therapeutic agents and validate their efficacy profile.
El factor de impacto mide la media del número de citaciones recibidas en un año por trabajos publicados en la publicación durante los dos años anteriores.
© Clarivate Analytics, Journal Citation Reports 2025
SJR es una prestigiosa métrica basada en la idea de que todas las citaciones no son iguales. SJR usa un algoritmo similar al page rank de Google; es una medida cuantitativa y cualitativa al impacto de una publicación.
Ver másSNIP permite comparar el impacto de revistas de diferentes campos temáticos, corrigiendo las diferencias en la probabilidad de ser citado que existe entre revistas de distintas materias.
Ver más

