Elsevier

Pediatric Neurology

Volume 51, Issue 5, November 2014, Pages 675-680
Pediatric Neurology

Original Article
Stimulant Use in Patients With Sturge-Weber Syndrome: Safety and Efficacy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.11.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Sturge-Weber syndrome is characterized by a facial port-wine birthmark, vascular eye abnormalities, and a leptomeningeal angioma. Attention and behavioral issues are common in Sturge-Weber syndrome. However, literature evidence for stimulant treatment is minimal. This study evaluates stimulant medication safety and efficacy in individuals with Sturge-Weber syndrome.

Methods

The research database of the Hunter Nelson Sturge-Weber Center (n = 210 subjects in the database) was reviewed for stimulant use. Twelve patients (mean age 10.5 years, age range 4 to 21 years) on stimulants were seen between 2003 and 2012. A retrospective chart review obtained comorbid diagnoses, stimulant type and dosage, medication side effects, vital signs, and medication efficacy.

Results

All 12 patients had brain involvement (unilateral, nine; bilateral, three). Additional comorbidities included epilepsy (twelve), hemiparesis (eight), headaches (eight), and vision deficits (six). Eight patients reported side effects, primarily appetite suppression (four) and headaches (three). There were no statistically significant changes in weight or blood pressure 6 months after medication initiation. Medication efficacy was subjectively reported in 11 patients. Seven patients remained on stimulants at their most recent follow-up visit.

Conclusions

This study preliminarily evaluates stimulant medication use in a small group of Sturge-Weber syndrome patients. Stimulants were tolerated and effective in most subjects. Side effects were mostly minor and medication did not negatively affect growth or vital signs. Stimulant medication may be a safe and effective intervention for Sturge-Weber syndrome children with attention issues/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Introduction

Major clinical features of Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) include seizures, stroke-like episodes, and glaucoma because of vascular malformations involving the skin, brain, and eyes. Several patients also have cognitive issues as well as difficulties with attention and behavior. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was observed in 42% of SWS patients described in one 40-year chart review.1 Chapieski et al. reported 22% of SWS patients with ADHD in a group of 79 patients.2 Although Turin et al. reported a 90% rate of attention problems in 10 children with SWS, none of those subjects met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- IV text revision criteria for ADHD after psychiatric evaluation.3 A recent survey from our center noted 10% of patients with self-reported ADHD.4 Clinicians' reluctance to use stimulant medications in SWS patients likely involves concerns for worsening seizure activity and possible neurovascular interactions. Current research is focused on the use of low dose aspirin as a potential neurological disease treatment option as well.5

Individuals with SWS commonly develop epilepsy and stroke-like episodes. Interestingly, ADHD is quite common in epilepsy; one population based study reported a 27.2% prevalence in pediatric epilepsy patients.6 Dunn et al. also found a gender ratio of 1:1 in comparison to a 2:1 male/female ratio in the general ADHD population as well as a higher overall prevalence of inattentive type ADHD.7 In addition, one study showed higher rates of ADHD in children with a history of stroke than in the general population.8 SWS patients are typically treated with a combination of medication titration and behavioral therapy to safely optimize seizure control, behavioral issues, and school performance. In addition, multiple studies have shown that stimulants do not increase seizures in epilepsy.9, 10

Although stimulant use is common in the typical child with a diagnosis of ADHD, medication safety and efficacy in children with neurovascular disease has not been well established. This study is the first to review stimulant use in a cohort of patients with SWS. The objective of the study is to describe efficacy and side effects of stimulant medications in a retrospective cohort of SWS patients.

Section snippets

Methods

The study population was drawn from patients seen at the Kennedy Krieger Institute Hunter Nelson Sturge-Weber Center, a multidisciplinary clinic dedicated to the patient care and research involving SWS. All patients signed informed consent forms and the research was approved by the Johns Hopkins Institutional Review Board. The Sturge-Weber Center research database contains records of 210 patients seen between January 2000 and December 2012. The medical records of patients with confirmed SWS

Results

Ninety-eight SWS patients with diagnosed brain involvement were seen at the Hunter Nelson Sturge-Weber Center between January 2000 and December 2012. Of the 98 subjects with brain involvement seen during that period, 13 were treated with a stimulant medication. One patient was not included in the study group because of overlapping treatment of symptoms with atomoxetine. The remaining 12 patients were evaluated at the center while on stimulants between 2003 and 2012.

Demographics

The 12 patients were seven males and five females. Subjects also had varying degrees of comorbid diagnoses, including epilepsy, hemiparesis, headaches, and visual field deficits. Eleven patients were on epilepsy medications concomitantly. One patient had a remote history of epilepsy and had been seizure free for many years and was no longer on an anticonvulsant regimen. See Table 1 for additional information regarding the patients.

Medication management

Stimulant medication was initiated in subjects primarily for ADHD (11 patients) and impaired alertness (one patient). The patient with impaired alertness would fall asleep multiple times during the day and have brief seizures during these times. Stimulant medication was started and increased his alertness during the day, decreased the frequency of his seizures, and improved sleep. Six patients were diagnosed with ADHD clinically by the neurologist because of impaired attention and hyperactivity

Conclusions

This study reviews stimulant use in a specialty clinic for patients with SWS. Eleven percent (11/98) of the total patients were diagnosed with ADHD in this study. This percentage is lower than many of the reported studies on SWS patients, but higher than survey data reported from our same patient population and the general population.1, 2, 3, 4 Gender ratios were equal between males and females in our group, similar to the gender breakdown in the epilepsy population.7 Diagnoses made in our

References (19)

  • I. Pascual-Castroviejo et al.

    Sturge-weber syndrome: study of 55 patients

    Can J Neurol Sci

    (2008)
  • L. Chapieski et al.

    Psychological functioning in children and adolescents with Sturge-Weber syndrome

    J Child Neurol

    (2000)
  • E. Turin et al.

    Behavioral and psychiatric features of sturge-weber syndrome

    J Nerv Ment Dis

    (2010)
  • M.J. Bay et al.

    Survey of aspirin use in sturge-weber syndrome

    J Child Neurol

    (2011)
  • E.I. Lance et al.

    Aspirin use in sturge-weber syndrome: Side effects and clinical outcomes

    J Child Neurol

    (2013)
  • R. Cohen et al.

    Prevalence of epilepsy and attention-deficit hyperactivity (ADHD) disorder: a population-based study

    J Child Neurol

    (2013)
  • D.W. Dunn et al.

    ADHD and epilepsy in childhood

    Dev Med Child Neurol

    (2003)
  • R. Everts et al.

    Cognitive functioning, behavior, and quality of life after stroke in childhood

    Child Neuropsychol

    (2008)
  • S.A. Hemmer et al.

    Stimulant therapy and seizure risk in children with ADHD

    Pediatr Neurol

    (2001)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text