Gene expression in canine atopic dermatitis and correlation with clinical severity scores

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.03.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) is a common condition in dogs that may be a naturally occurring model for human atopic dermatitis (hAD). Despite this, comparative research is limited, particularly into the genetic background of cAD.

Objectives

  • 1.

    Measure candidate gene expression in cAD skin using quantitative real time PCR (qPCR)

  • 2.

    Correlate gene expression to clinical cAD scores (Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index [CADESI]-03 and intradermal allergen test [IDT]).

Methods

mRNA was extracted from biopsies of non-lesional and lesional skin from atopic dogs, and healthy skin from non-atopic dogs. Gene expression was quantified using qPCR, and compared between non-lesional atopic, lesional atopic and healthy skin. Gene expression in atopic skin was correlated with clinical severity (CADESI-03) and the number of positive reactions on an IDT.

Results

Of the 20 quantified genes, 11 demonstrated statistically significant altered mRNA expression between atopic and healthy skin; dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP4), phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate-5-phosphatase-2 (INPPL1), serine protease inhibitor kazal type-5 (SPINK5), sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase-1 (SGPL1), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), S100 calcium-binding protein A8 (S100A8), Plakophilin-2 (PKP2), Periostin (POSTN), Cullin4A, TNF-α and metalloproteinase inhibitor-1 (TIMP-1). Three genes correlated with CADESI-03: serum amyloid A 1 (SAA-1), S100A8, and PKP2; and four with IDT results: mast cell protease I (CMA1), SAA-1, S100A8 and SPINK5.

Conclusion

Genes with altered expression included those relevant to skin barrier formation and immune function, suggesting both are relevant in the pathogenesis of AD. Many of these genes reflect the proposed pathogenesis in hAD, supporting the use of dogs as a model for hAD. Furthermore, these genes may be considered suitable targets for future genetic and protein function studies in human and canine AD.

Introduction

Canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) is a common condition that can be considered a naturally occurring, spontaneous model of human atopic dermatitis (hAD). There are many animal models which display clinical signs consistent with hAD but dogs are of particular interest as they share the same environment as humans, unlike the commonly used rodent models. The pathogenesis of the disease in both humans and dogs is strongly associated with immunological hyper-reactivity, although skin barrier function, microbial colonisation and infection may also have a role [1], [2]. The prevalence of AD over the last three decades has increased in both dogs [3] and humans [4], suggesting common environmental and/or genetic components.

Unlike most murine models cAD is not caused by a single gene defect, and, like hAD, is a polygenic disorder with complex inheritance and interactions with environmental influences. It is therefore a potential complex model for the human condition. Using dogs as a model to study of the genetic basis of AD is advantageous because dog breeds form genetically isolated populations in strong linkage disequilibrium [5]. Fewer genetic markers are required to identify an association with a given phenotype and smaller sample sizes can be used to find these associations compared to human genetic studies [6]. However, research into cAD has been limited to reporting cytokine and chemokine profile changes [7] until recently, when a message RNA (mRNA) expression microarray study was performed [8]. Similarities between dysregulated genes in hAD and cAD were identified, although the number and relevance of the genes tested were limited. In hAD, microarray and qPCR analysis of gene expression, linkage studies and candidate gene analyses have been used to identify causative or susceptibility alleles. These studies have implicated a large number of genes and regions [9]. Twelve genes with relevant epidermal or immune functions (Cystatin A [10], [11], CARD4 [12], P-selectin [13], [14], PKP2 [15], PPARγ [16], [17], SGPL1 [18], TNF-α [19], [9], Cadherin-13 [20], CMA1 [21], [22], DPP4 [23], SPINK5 [24], [25], SAA-1 [26]), were selected as potential candidate genes for AD. Eight further genes (ARTS-1, Cullin-4A, INPPL1, S100A8, POSTN, SCCA2, STAT2, TIMP-1) were selected using data from a canine mRNA expression microarray [8], showing that they were dysregulated in cAD.

The aim of this study was to quantify the expression of these candidate genes in lesional atopic, non-lesional atopic and healthy canine skin. Gene expression in atopic skin was also correlated with two clinical measures: the Canine Atopic Dermatitis and Severity Index (CADESI-03), which is similar to the human SCORAD index, and the number of positive reactions on intradermal testing (similar to prick tests in human patients) with individual allergens (IDT). Determining whether cAD and hAD share a similar genetic background will provide evidence that cAD is a suitable complex model for the human condition, and help identify novel target genes for further study of pathogenesis and intervention.

Section snippets

Animals

Lesional and non-lesional skin was obtained from 14 dogs with AD (seven males and seven females), with a mean age of 3.2 years (age range 11 months to 8 years 7 months). The breeds were: Boxer (5), Staffordshire bull terrier, Labrador, crossbreed (2), Springer spaniel, Rhodesian ridgeback, Bulldog, West Highland white terrier and Neapolitan mastiff. Lesional samples were also taken from three more atopic dogs (all female) with a mean age of 5.3 years (age range 1 year 9 months to 9 years 2

Gene expression in cAD lesional, cAD non-lesional and healthy dog skin

Table 2 shows the fold change in gene-specific mRNA expression among lesional, non-lesional and control skin. Statistically significant changes in fold change of gene expression were seen between lesional atopic and control skin for SPINK5, INPPL1, DPP4, SGPL1, PPARγ, S100, PKP2, POSTN and Cullin-4A. Non-lesional skin also showed statistically significant changes in expression compared to control skin for DPP4, INPPL1, PPARγ and S100, though to a lesser extent than in lesional skin. Only PPARγ

Discussion

In this study, we used data from previous microarray studies and from the published literature to select candidate genes implicated in the pathogenesis of AD. The data showed that 11 out of the 20 quantified genes demonstrated statistically significant altered mRNA expression between atopic and healthy skin. The functions of these genes vary, but include both immunological and skin barrier functions. Seven out of the 11 genes have shown previous associations or altered expression in hAD. The

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and Pfizer Animal Health

References (53)

  • N. Busso et al.

    Circulating CD26 is negatively associated with inflammation in human and experimental arthritis

    Am J Pathol

    (2005)
  • G. Ghersi et al.

    Regulation of fibroblast migration on collagenous matrix by a cell surface peptidase complex

    J Biol Chem

    (2002)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Protein Binding and Functional Characterization of Plakophilin 2. Evidence for its Diverse roles in desmosomes and beta -catenin signalling

    J Biol Chem

    (2002)
  • N. Komatsu et al.

    Elevated stratum corneum hydrolytic Activity in Netherton Syndrome Suggests an inhibitory regulation of desquamation by SPINK5-derived peptide

    J Invest Dermatol

    (2002)
  • Timothy Hla

    Signaling and biological actions of sphingosine 1-phosphate

    Pharmacol Res

    (2003)
  • U. Reiss et al.

    Sphingosine-phosphate lyase enhances stress-induced ceramide generation and apoptosis

    J Biol Chem

    (2004)
  • T. Olivry et al.

    Lack of detection of circulating skin-specific IgE autoantibodies in dogs with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis

    Vet Immunol Immunopathol

    (2008)
  • P.B. Hill et al.

    The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (VI): IgE-induced immediate and late-phase reactions, two inflammatory sequences at sites of intradermal allergen injections

    Vet Immunol Immunopathol

    (2001)
  • VickeryF B.P.

    Skin barrier function in atopic dermatitis

    Curr Opin Pediatr

    (2007)
  • A. Hiller et al.

    The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (I): incidence and prevalence

    Vet Immunol Immunopathol

    (2001)
  • H.C. Williams

    Is the prevalence of atopic dermatitis increasing?

    Clin Exp Dermatol

    (1992)
  • N.B. Sutter et al.

    Extensive and breed-specific linkage disequilibrium in Canis familiaris

    Genome Res

    (2004)
  • M.P. Starkey et al.

    Dogs really are man's best friend—canine genomics has applications in veterinary and human medicine!

    Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic

    (2005)
  • T.J. Nuttall et al.

    Expression of T-helper 1, T-helper 2 and immunosuppressive cytokines in canine atopic dermatitis

    Clin Exp Allergy

    (2002)
  • A.E. Merryman-Simpson et al.

    Gene (mRNA) expression in canine atopic dermatitis: microarray analysis

    Vet Dermatol

    (2008)
  • Y. Vasilopoulos et al.

    A nonsynonymous substitution of cystatin A, a cysteine protease inhibitor of house dust mite protease, leads to decreased mRNA stability and shows a significant association with atopic dermatitis

    Allergy

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text