Dermatologic surgery
Evaluation of mapping biopsies for extramammary Paget disease: A retrospective study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.040Get rights and content

Background

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) sometimes shows an ill-defined border and an unexpectedly extended tumor spread beyond the clinical borders. Mapping biopsy is 1 approach for complete surgical removal, but its efficacy has remained controversial.

Objective

We sought to evaluate mapping biopsies for EMPD.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 133 patients with 150 primary EMPD lesions. We histopathologically examined 1182 skin biopsy specimens (975 from mapping biopsy and 207 from lesional biopsy).

Results

Only 1.6% of mapping biopsy specimens from well-defined EMPD (13 of 810) were positive. Moreover, 4.6% of mapping biopsy specimens from ill-defined EMPD (8 of 165) were positive, whereas all specimens taken from sites 2 cm or more from the clinical border were negative. For both well-defined and ill-defined EMPD, there was no significant difference in the margin status of surgical resection regardless of mapping biopsy.

Limitations

This was a retrospective study.

Conclusions

Mapping biopsies are unnecessary for well-defined EMPD or when 2-cm margins can be achieved, whereas surgical removal with predetermined margins (1 cm for well-defined EMPD and 2 cm for ill-defined EMPD) appears to be safe. Mapping biopsies can be considered when shortening of the safe surgical margin to less than 2 cm is required in ill-defined EMPD.

Section snippets

Patients

This study is a retrospective review of our patients that was conducted in accordance with the principles embodied in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Kyushu University (No. 26-1). We identified 133 patients with 150 EMPD lesions at the Department of Dermatology of Kyushu University (Fukuoka, Japan) between January 1997 and June 2016. All lesions were primary EMPD; cases of secondary EMPD were excluded. We retrieved clinical and demographic

Demographic and clinical data

Comprehensive clinical data on all 133 patients with 150 EMPD lesions are shown in Table I. All patients were Japanese, with a mean age of 72.0 years. Tumors were predominantly localized in the genital area (85.7%). A total of 15 patients (11.3%) had a double primary EMPD and 1 had a triple primary EMPD (Supplemental Table I; available at http://www.jaad.org). The median follow-up period was 6.9 years (range, 1.2 months–17.1 years). All of the patients underwent lesional biopsy to confirm the

Discussion

In the current study, we re-evaluated the efficacy of mapping biopsy and made several important findings. First, we detected Paget cells in only 21 (2.2%) of 975 mapping biopsy specimens. This rate of positivity for tumor seems to be extremely low and may indicate the limited importance of mapping biopsy in a clinical context. When we focused on mapping biopsy for well-defined EMPD, only 1.6% of biopsy specimens were affected by Paget cells, suggesting that mapping biopsy should be skipped for

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (31)

  • Extramammary Paget's disease: Our 15-year experience in a Southeast Asian population

    2023, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
  • Extramammary Paget's disease: Updates in the workup and management

    2022, Asian Journal of Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Another case study by Adashek et al. [27] described using a punch biopsy-based mapping technique for determination of true borders of the lesion, by marking the skin surrounding the lesion and obtaining 2 mm punch biopsies circumferentially every 1 cm out to 5 cm from the visible edges of the lesion. Contrary to this approach, some have advocated for smaller margins between 1 cm and 2 cm [27,28]. Closer margins presented higher recurrence rates but could minimize wound defects that might require subsequent skin graft or perineal reconstruction procedure (Fig. 3) [29].

  • Multidisciplinary Approach for the Management of Penoscrotal Extramammary Paget's disease –An eUROGEN study

    2021, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the advanced age and comorbidities in this patient cohort often precludes offering further extensive surgery and adjuvant topical or laser treatment was used. The results of our case series which is the largest from a European centre are comparable to other published reports and based on these results we have proposed an algorithm for the management of patients with penoscrotal EMPD (Fig. 3) [1-40]. This multidisciplinary approach has meant that patients can be treated for non-invasive EMP and avoid extensive surgery provided that R1 resections are accepted and patients undergo adjuvant topical treatment and close surveillance.

  • Extramammary Paget Disease

    2020, Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas
  • Extramammary Paget's Disease

    2019, Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Preoperative mapping biopsies were performed in 45 of these patients (68%), and use of mapping biopsy did not correlate with local recurrence (P = 1.000).16 There are many studies investigating the role (if any) of preoperative mapping biopsies, intraoperative frozen sections, and other techniques to maximize the efficacy of surgery, which may be particularly relevant when Mohs is not available.25–31 Processing the peripheral and deep margin via Mohs, while sending the central portion for conventional pathology in order to assess tumor depth for prognostic purposes, is also reasonable.26

View all citing articles on Scopus

Drs Kaku-Ito and Ito contributed equally to this article.

Funding sources: Supported in part by grants from the National Cancer Center, Japan; Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology; and Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan.

Conflicts of interest: None disclosed.

View full text