Elsevier

Clinics in Dermatology

Volume 26, Issue 1, January–February 2008, Pages 35-44
Clinics in Dermatology

Body-modifying concepts and dermatologic problems: tattooing and piercing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.10.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Recently, piercing and tattooing have gained increasing popularity worldwide, through all social classes and age groups. Besides pierced ear lobes, piercing of the tongue, nose, nipples, bellybutton, and even the genitals is quite common.

The variety of tattoos range from temporary henna tattoos to permanent makeup and permanent tattoos, where the pigments are deposed in the dermis.

These trends are supplemented by more invasive methods of body modification such as implanting, scarification, or branding.

Parallel with the increasing popularity of piercing and tattoos, the knowledge about associated complications rose. Complications depend substantially on the circumstances in which body modifications are applied, the materials used, and the body region concerned.

This article gives an overview of the most common complications of body modification methods, which mainly result from shortcomings in the application itself or in hygiene regimens. Consequences may be as severe as life-threatening events or permanent malfunction of different organs.

Introduction

The term tattooing goes back to a Tahitian term (Ta tatau, meaning appropriate, balanced, and fitting) and describes the implantation of pigment in the skin.1 Skin perforation (piercing) to attach jewelry made of metal, plastic materials, or bone has been performed for centuries and has been widely practiced, especially on the Asian, African, and American continents.

Tattoos and piercing are fashionable not only in young age groups. Although exact data are missing, it is estimated that roughly 10% of the population are wearing a tattoo. An estimated 7 to 20 million Americans may be tattooed.2 Concerning piercing, these rates are even higher because of the wide practice of earlobe piercing. In a recent survey of New York area college students, 60% of the women and 42% of the men students (n = 482) were pierced.3

The individual rationales for the decision to get a tattoo are quite heterogeneous. The deciding factors are probably individual attitude, the circumstances of life, or maybe group pressure.

In the past, a majority of the general population disapproved of tattoos and piercing, with one exception: the earlobe piercing. In the last 2 decades, especially, tattoos gained more and more acceptance, probably because very widely known icons from sport and media wear more and more tattoos in public. This trend is accompanied by a substantial increase in associated complication. Most general practitioners in the United Kingdom (95%) saw at least 1 complication after piercing.4 Thorough knowledge about frequent complications and their management as well as common reconstructive strategies of defects caused by piercing is of increasing importance.

Section snippets

Reactions to permanent tattoos

Intolerance reactions were seen to almost all “classic” pigments and their degradation products used in tattooing, such as dichromate- (green), cobalt- (blue), cadmium- (yellow), and mercury salt– (red) based pigments. Especially for the mercury salt containing the red pigment cinnabar (HgS), quite a lot of allergic and lichenoid reactions were reported (Fig. 1).5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 In addition, contamination of the tattoo and permanent makeup pigments with nickel sulfate

Branding and scarification

Branding and scarification lead to patterns of permanent scars in the skin. These scars result from different procedures such as electrocaustic methods, chemicals, laser, heated metals, or freezing. These procedures are accompanied by an increased risk of local and systemic infections.

Dependent on the method used, allergic reactions are possible. Another problem can be hypertrophic scars, which in severe cases could lead to limited mobility of limbs and, with a delay of years to decades, even

Piercing

The rate of acute complications concerning piercing depends crucially on the experience of the piercer, the hygiene regimens in place, and the behavior and the after-piercing treatment by the customer. Other important complication-determining factors are the localization of the piercing and the materials used. Mild, mainly transient, and partly typical complications are reported with a frequency of 10% to 20%, in some studies up to 30%. Severe complications after earlobe piercing were only seen

References (129)

  • F.C. Wolfort et al.

    Superficial melanoma in a tattoo

    Br J Plast Surg

    (1974)
  • I.U. Khan et al.

    Malignant melanoma disguised by a tattoo

    Br J Plast Surg

    (1999)
  • H. Hannah et al.

    Tattoo pigment masquerading as secondary malignant melanoma

    Br J Plast Surg

    (2000)
  • K.M. Kuczkowski

    Labour analgesia for the parturient with lumbar tattoos: what does an obstetrician need to know

    Arch Gynecol Obstet

    (2006)
  • S. Kumar et al.

    Branding: a harmful practice

    Indian Pediatr

    (2005)
  • I. Yeruham et al.

    Skin tumours in cattle and sheep after freeze- or heat-branding

    J Comp Pathol

    (1996)
  • T.L. Brooks et al.

    Body modification and substance use in adolescents: is there a link?

    J Adolesc Health

    (2003)
  • T.C. Simplot et al.

    Comparison between cartilage and soft tissue ear piercing complications

    Am J Otolaryngol

    (1998)
  • M.J. Alter

    Hepatitis C virus infection in the United States

    J Hepatol

    (1999)
  • C. Ochsenfahrt et al.

    Endocarditis after nipple piercing in a patient with a bicuspid aortic valve

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2001)
  • K. Graudenz et al.

    Diffused traumatic dirt and decorative tattooing, Removal by Q-switched lasers

    Hautarzt

    (2003)
  • I. Waldmann et al.

    Delayed type allergic reaction to red azo dye in tattoo

    Hautarzt

    (1997)
  • U. Amann et al.

    Lichenoid pseudolymphomatous tattooing reaction

    Hautarzt

    (1997)
  • C.I. Jacob

    Tattoo-associated dermatoses: a case report and review of the literature

    Dermatol Surg

    (2002)
  • A. Taaffe et al.

    The red tattoo and lichen planus

    Int J Dermatol

    (1980)
  • M.E. Kyanko et al.

    Red tattoo reaction: treatment with the carbon dioxide laser

    J Dermatol Surg Oncol

    (1989)
  • G.F. Bagnato et al.

    Urticaria in a tattooed patient

    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr)

    (1999)
  • J. Clarke et al.

    Lichenoid tattoo reactions

    Br J Dermatol

    (1979)
  • C. Hindson et al.

    Laser therapy of lichenoid red tattoo reaction

    Br J Dermatol

    (1995)
  • R. Ashinoff et al.

    Allergic reactions to tattoo pigment after laser treatment

    Dermatol Surg

    (1995)
  • L. Biro et al.

    Unusual complications of mercurial (cinnabar) tattoo. Generalized eczematous eruption following laceration of a tattoo

    Arch Dermatol

    (1967)
  • R. Gallo et al.

    Allergic reaction to India ink in a black tattoo

    Contact Dermatitis

    (1998)
  • B. Greve et al.

    Contact dermatitis from red tattoo pigment (quinacridone) with secondary spread

    Contact Dermatitis

    (2003)
  • C. Jäger et al.

    Contact dermatitis to permanent make up: manifestation of a pre existing nickel allergy

    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges

    (2005)
  • J. Matulich et al.

    A temporary henna tattoo causing hair and clothing dye allergy

    Contact Dermatitis

    (2005)
  • Y. Cui et al.

    Photodecomposition of Pigment Yellow 74, a pigment used in tattoo inks

    Photochem Photobiol

    (2004)
  • J. Verdich

    Granulomatous reaction in a red tattoo

    Acta Derm Venereol

    (1981)
  • A.E. Werchniak et al.

    Sarcoidosis presenting as tattoo changes in a patient undergoing treatment with interferon-alpha and ribavirin

    Clin Exp Dermatol

    (2004)
  • J.M. Iveson et al.

    Sarcoidosis presenting with multiple tattoo granulomata

    Postgrad Med J

    (1985)
  • M. Mahalingam et al.

    Morphea-like tattoo reaction

    Am J Dermatopathol

    (2002)
  • E. Balfour et al.

    Massive pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia: an unusual reaction to a tattoo

    Am J Dermatopathol

    (2003)
  • J.S. Pasricha et al.

    Contact dermatitis to henna

    Contact Dermatitis

    (1980)
  • K.H. Schulz et al.

    The sensitizing capacity of naturally occurring quinones. I. Naphthoquinones and related compounds

    Arch Dermatol Res

    (1977)
  • W. Handrick et al.

    Infectious due to body piercing and tattoos a review

    Wien Med Wochenschr

    (2003)
  • M.L. Armstrong et al.

    Tattooed army soldiers: examining the incidence, behavior, and risk

    Mil Med

    (2000)
  • D.K. Satchithananda et al.

    Bacterial endocarditis following repeated tattooing

    Heart

    (2000)
  • A. Ghorpade

    Lupus vulgaris over a tattoo mark—inoculation tuberculosis

    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol

    (2003)
  • R. Wolf et al.

    A tattooed butterfly as a vector of atypical Mycobacteria

    J Am Acad Dermatol

    (2003)
  • G.E. Long et al.

    Infectious complications of tattoo

    Clin Infect Dis

    (1994)
  • A. Ghorpade

    Inoculation (tattoo) leprosy: a report of 31 cases

    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol

    (2002)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Tattoo in forensic science: An Indian perspective

      2020, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
    • Decorative tatoo complications: New informations justifying pressing action

      2020, Bulletin de l'Academie Nationale de Medecine
    • Dermatoses caused by cultural practices: Cosmetic cultural practices

      2018, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Complications with scarification include keloid formation (as the desired effect),103 squamous cell carcinoma,106 and infection with hepatitis B and C and HIV.104 Cutaneous complications from tattooing include impetigo, cellulitis, hypersensitivity, scarring, keloid formation, allergic contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, foreign body reaction, abscess formation, and koebnerization.103,106,107 Infection with hepatitis B and C, HIV, syphilis, leprosy, and leishmaniasis has occurred.103,105,106

    • A medical-toxicological view of tattooing

      2016, The Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although difficult to treat, infections with fungi and viruses are rare.2,3,19 Bacterial infections are far more prominent and culprits consist of, among others, group A Staphylococci spp (eg, Staphyloccus aureus), Streptococci spp (eg, Streptococcus pyogenes), mycobacteria (non-tuberculous and tuberculous) and pseudomonads.4,20–23 The risk of infection depends mainly on the conditions under which the tattooing is done, and unhygienic practices such as moistening of the needle with saliva have traditionally been a major source of pathogens.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text