Elsevier

Chemosphere

Volume 104, June 2014, Pages 44-50
Chemosphere

Ecotoxicological evaluation of four UV filters using marine organisms from different trophic levels Isochrysis galbana, Mytilus galloprovincialis, Paracentrotus lividus, and Siriella armata

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.053Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We assessed the risk by input of UV filters into marine recreational waters.

  • UV filter concentrations measured in beach water ranged between 35 and 164 ng L−1.

  • 4-MBC and BP-3 toxicity thresholds to marine organisms were 4–5 μg L−1.

  • EHMC and BP-4 were less toxic.

  • There is a potential risk to coastal environment for UV filters BP-3 and 4-MBC.

Abstract

Due to the concern about the negative effects of exposure to sunlight, combinations of UV filters like 4-Methylbenzylidene-camphor (4-MBC), Benzophenone-3 (BP-3), Benzophenone-4 (BP-4) and 2-Ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC) are being introduced in all kind of cosmetic formulas. These chemicals are acquiring a concerning status due to their increasingly common use and the potential risk for the environment. The aim of this study is to assess the behaviour of these compounds in seawater, the toxicity to marine organisms from three trophic levels including autotrophs (Isochrysis galbana), herbivores (Mytilus galloprovincialis and Paracentrotus lividus) and carnivores (Siriella armata), and set a preliminary assessment of potential ecological risk of UV filters in coastal ecosystems. In general, EC50 results show that both EHMC and 4-MBC are the most toxic for our test species, followed by BP-3 and finally BP-4. The most affected species by the presence of these UV filters are the microalgae I. galbana, which showed toxicity thresholds in the range of μg L−1 units, followed by S. armata > P. Lividus > M. galloprovincialis. The UV filter concentrations measured in the sampled beach water were in the range of tens or even hundreds of ng L−1. The resulting risk quotients showed appreciable environmental risk in coastal environments for BP-3 and 4-MBC.

Introduction

Emerging pollutants are chemical compounds not usually considered of interest in routine environmental analysis but that are becoming of environmental concern because of their increasingly common use and the potential risk to human and ecosystem health, including: pharmaceuticals and personal care products, endocrine disruptors, nanoparticles, industrial chemicals, biological metabolites and toxins among these substances (Richardson, 2010, Rosenfeld and Feng, 2011). Due to the increasing concern about the negative effects of extended exposure to sunlight, combinations of several chemicals – what we refer as UV filters – are being introduced not only into sunscreens but also into all kinds of cosmetic formulas (creams, shampoos). UV filters are aromatic compounds such as 4-Methylbenzylidene-camphor (4-MBC), Benzophenone-3 (BP-3), Benzophenone-4 (BP-4) and 2-Ethylhexyl-4-methoxycinnamate (EHMC) which are extensively used in common personal care products because they adsorb UV radiation. Composition of cosmetic products in Europe is regulated by Directive76/768/CEE (EC, 1976), and the maximum content of the above compounds in commercial products is by law 4% 4-MBC, 10% BP-3, 5% BP-4 and 10% EHMC. In USA the composition is regulated by US Food and Drug Administration (US Food 2013) and stipulates slightly different values for the maximum content of UV filters, namely: 6% BP-3, 10% BP-4 and 10% EHMC, the use of 4-MBC is not allowed as a sunscreen component in USA. Some UV filters are also considered chemicals of concern because they have shown estrogenic activity in in vitro laboratory tests on fish and other aquatic organisms (Balmer et al., 2005, Kunz and Fent, 2006, Kunz et al., 2006, Brausch and Rand, 2011).

To be effective, UV filters must be stable on exposure to UV radiation, but several studies have reported degradation by photolysis (Diaz-Cruz et al., 2008, Rodil et al., 2008, Richardson, 2010) and little is known about the toxicity of the degradation products. UV filters enter the marine environment from discharges of lakes and rivers (Balmer et al., 2005), from sewage sludge and from direct washing in recreational locations and beaches (Plagellat et al., 2006, Rodil et al., 2008, Fent et al., 2009). Their use is so widespread that they are commonly detected in wastewaters, swimming-pool waters, rivers, lakes and the oceanic superficial microlayer. However most information about the detection, concentration and effects on living organisms comes mainly from rivers and lakes where their high environmental concentration is increasingly worrying (Balmer et al., 2005, Buser et al., 2006, Fent et al., 2010). In contrast, data available from marine/coastal ecosystems are very scarce (Langford and Thomas, 2008, Rodil et al., 2012).

The aim of this study is to assess the behaviour in seawater and the toxicity to marine organisms of four of the most commonly used UV filters, 4-MBC, BP-3, BP-4 and EHMC. For the toxicity assessment four representative test organisms from three different trophic levels were used. These experiments provide a preliminary assessment of potential ecological risk of UV filters in coastal ecosystems, by following risk characterization procedures based on both the presence of these compounds in the marine environment and the inherent toxicity of these chemicals tested in laboratory bioassays. In our knowledge, this is the first risk assessment study of UV filters conducted in the marine environment.

Section snippets

Biological material and toxicity tests

All biological materials were provided by ECIMAT (Toralla Marine Station, University of Vigo), either cultured in the Marine Station or collected from the most oceanic part of Ria de Vigo (Galicia, NW Iberian Peninsula), and conditioned in running seawater facilities.

A non-axenic culture of Isochrysis galbana provided by ECIMAT was grown in a 10-fold diluted EDTA-free f/2 medium, and kept in an incubator at 20 °C with 24 h light cycle (salinity 34 ppt, ⩾8 mg L−1 dissolved oxygen, pH  8) until

Stability of the chemicals in solution

Concerning their stability in aqueous solution, the UV filters tested showed different behaviour depending on the substance and the experimental set-up (Table 1). In the testing conditions used for the Paracentotus lividus and M. galloprovincialis bioassays, BP-3 and 4-MBC showed remarkable stability, with an average drop of 23% for BP-3 and 27% for 4-MBC after 48 h. In contrast, EHMC was very instable and its measured concentration showed a 72% reduction after 48 h in solution. In the testing

Discussion

Based on the EC50 values, EHMC and 4-MBC are the most toxic UV filters for marine invertebrates, whereas BP-3 was selectively toxic for the microalgae I. galbana at concentrations as low as ng mL−1 units. Finally BP-4 was found to have the lowest toxicity for all test species. This ranking of toxicity is consistent with previous results on freshwater species, such as the crustacean D. magna (Fent et al., 2009) where EHMC was more toxic than 4-MBC, followed by BP-3 and finally BP-4. These

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Galician Government (Xunta de Galicia) through the Research Project Ref. 10MDS700006PR. One of us (E.P.) was granted with a FPU Fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education. R.R. and J.B.Q. were granted with Ramón y Cajal research program from the Spanish Ministry of Education. The authors acknowledge T. Tato, N. Trigo and the staff of ECIMAT for their helpful technical support.

References (37)

  • R. Rodil et al.

    Multi-residue analytical method for the determination of emerging pollutants in water by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2009)
  • R. Rodil et al.

    Emerging pollutants in sewage, surface and drinking water in Galicia (NW Spain)

    Chemosphere

    (2012)
  • L. Saco-Alvarez et al.

    Methodological basis for the optimization of a marine sea-urchin embryo test (SET) for the ecological assessment of coastal water quality

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (2010)
  • M.E. Balmer et al.

    Occurrence of some organic UV filters in wastewater, in surface waters, and in fish from Swiss lakes

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2005)
  • J. Beiras et al.

    Inhibition of embryo development of the Mytilus galloprovincialis marine mussel by organic pollutants; assessment of risk for its extensive culture in the Galician Rias

    Aquaculture

    (2008)
  • R. Beiras et al.

    Effects of dissolved mercury on embryogenesis, survival and growth of Mytilus galloprovincialis mussel larvae

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (1995)
  • J. Bellas et al.

    Toxicity of organotin compounds to marine invertebrate embryos and larvae: a comparison between the sea urchin embryogenesis bioassay and an alternative test species

    Ecotoxicology

    (2005)
  • S. Bratkovics et al.

    Determination of seven commonly used organic UV filters in fresh and saline waters by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

    Anal. Methods

    (2011)
  • Cited by (150)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text