Comment
Should e-cigarettes be regulated as a medicinal device?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70124-3Get rights and content

References (15)

  • R Murray et al.

    Safety of nicotine polacrilex gum used by 3,094 participants in the lung health study

    Chest

    (1996)
  • NK Cobb et al.

    E-cigarette or drug-delivery device? Regulating novel nicotine products

    New Engl J Med

    (2011)
  • R Borland

    Electronic cigarettes as a method of tobacco control

    BMJ

    (2011)
  • TL Wagener et al.

    Electronic cigarettes: achieving a balanced perspective

    Addiction

    (2012)
  • C Bates

    The counterfactual. Reasonable people saying sensible things about low-risk alternatives to smoking

  • J Foulds et al.

    Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden

    Tob Control

    (2003)
  • I Lund et al.

    The relative risk to health from snus and cigarettes: Response to Grimsrud et al

    Nicotine Tob Res

    (2013)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • The effect of e-cigarette warning labels on college students’ perception of e-cigarettes and intention to use e-cigarettes

    2018, Addictive Behaviors
    Citation Excerpt :

    Our findings revealed that current e-cigarette warning labels only focus on increasing consumers' risk perception rather than decreasing their perceived advantage. Based on findings of previous studies (Etter, 2013; Etter & Bullen, 2014; Hajek, Foulds, JLe, Sweanor, & Yach, 2013), a greater percentage of the public believes e-cigarette to be a safer alternative to cigarette smoking. This perception may make people mistakenly believe the e-cigarette use is safe.

  • Hospitalized smokers' expectancies for electronic cigarettes versus tobacco cigarettes

    2015, Addictive Behaviors
    Citation Excerpt :

    Considering the low utilization of NRT among tobacco smokers (Cummings & Hyland, 2005), our findings may therefore foreshadow limited sustained uptake of e-cigarettes by tobacco smokers in the future. However, as e-cigarettes are not yet subject to regulation in the US, a number of changes could be made to the products to improve their appeal to tobacco smokers in relatively rapid order (Hajek et al., 2013). Insofar that expectancies actively shape future experience (Hendricks & Leventhal, 2013), our results also suggest that tobacco smokers' subjective responses to e-cigarettes might fall short of their responses to tobacco cigarettes, possibly limiting the efficacy of e-cigarettes in tobacco treatment settings.

  • Harm reduction at the crossroads: The case of e-cigarettes

    2014, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text