CommentShould e-cigarettes be regulated as a medicinal device?
References (15)
- et al.
Safety of nicotine polacrilex gum used by 3,094 participants in the lung health study
Chest
(1996) - et al.
E-cigarette or drug-delivery device? Regulating novel nicotine products
New Engl J Med
(2011) Electronic cigarettes as a method of tobacco control
BMJ
(2011)- et al.
Electronic cigarettes: achieving a balanced perspective
Addiction
(2012) The counterfactual. Reasonable people saying sensible things about low-risk alternatives to smoking
- et al.
Effect of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden
Tob Control
(2003) - et al.
The relative risk to health from snus and cigarettes: Response to Grimsrud et al
Nicotine Tob Res
(2013)
Cited by (23)
The effect of e-cigarette warning labels on college students’ perception of e-cigarettes and intention to use e-cigarettes
2018, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Our findings revealed that current e-cigarette warning labels only focus on increasing consumers' risk perception rather than decreasing their perceived advantage. Based on findings of previous studies (Etter, 2013; Etter & Bullen, 2014; Hajek, Foulds, JLe, Sweanor, & Yach, 2013), a greater percentage of the public believes e-cigarette to be a safer alternative to cigarette smoking. This perception may make people mistakenly believe the e-cigarette use is safe.
Nicorette reborn? E-cigarettes in light of the history of nicotine replacement technology
2015, International Journal of Drug PolicyHospitalized smokers' expectancies for electronic cigarettes versus tobacco cigarettes
2015, Addictive BehaviorsCitation Excerpt :Considering the low utilization of NRT among tobacco smokers (Cummings & Hyland, 2005), our findings may therefore foreshadow limited sustained uptake of e-cigarettes by tobacco smokers in the future. However, as e-cigarettes are not yet subject to regulation in the US, a number of changes could be made to the products to improve their appeal to tobacco smokers in relatively rapid order (Hajek et al., 2013). Insofar that expectancies actively shape future experience (Hendricks & Leventhal, 2013), our results also suggest that tobacco smokers' subjective responses to e-cigarettes might fall short of their responses to tobacco cigarettes, possibly limiting the efficacy of e-cigarettes in tobacco treatment settings.
Is there any legal and scientific basis for classifying electronic cigarettes as medications?
2014, International Journal of Drug PolicyHarm reduction at the crossroads: The case of e-cigarettes
2014, American Journal of Preventive Medicine