Información de la revista
Vol. 114. Núm. 6.
Páginas T533-T535 (junio 2023)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
3092
Vol. 114. Núm. 6.
Páginas T533-T535 (junio 2023)
Resident's Forum
Acceso a texto completo
RF-Topical Cholesterol and Statin Formulation to Treat Porokeratosis
FR-Formulación tópica de estatinas y colesterol como tratamiento de poroqueratosis
Visitas
3092
J. Gimeno Castilloa,
Autor para correspondencia
javiergimenocastillo@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, F.J. de la Torre Gomarb
a Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Araba, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
b Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
Contenido relacionado
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2023;114:533-510.1016/j.ad.2022.06.025
J. Gimeno Castillo, F.J. de la Torre Gomar
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (1)
Table 1. Summary of Case Reports and Series Describing the Use of Topical Statin and Cholesterol Formulations in Porokeratosis.
Texto completo

Porokeratosis describes a heterogeneous group of keratinization disorders of unknown pathogenesis. It has various clinical forms that differ according to lesion number, size, and distribution. These include porokeratosis of Mibelli, disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis, porokeratosis palmaris et plantaris disseminata, and linear porokeratosis.1 Lesions typically manifest as erythematous macules surrounded by a characteristically hyperkeratotic border. The most characteristic histologic findings are foci of dyskeratotic cells in the granular layer and columns of parakeratosis known as cornoid lamellae.1

Porokeratosis usually follows a chronic course and is refractory to treatment. A range of topical, systemic and physical treatments have been used with variable results.

Germline loss-of-function mutations in the HMG-CoA reductase pathway (specifically involving the phosphomevalonate kinase and mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase genes) were recently described in porokeratosis. These mutations would lead to a deficiency in end products of this pathway (which include cholesterol) and subsequent accumulation of toxic metabolites and increased premature apoptosis of keratinocytes. The suggestion that these events might explain the porokeratosis phenotype2 has prompted the search for treatment alternatives specifically targeting the HMG-CoA reductase pathway. These alternatives include compounded cream or lotion formulations applied every 12 hours that combine cholesterol (generally at 2% or 5%) and a 2% statin (simvastatin or lovastatin). Current understanding of the pharmacokinetics of topically applied statins is limited, but it is thought that lipophilic statins (lovastatin, simvastatin) may be more effective due to greater transdermal absorption and that oral formulations are likely to be ineffective due to first-pass metabolism in the liver. It is also unclear whether treatment effectiveness is affected by specific mutations. Topical cholesterol appears to be less effective when administered as monotherapy. The combined treatment, by contrast, has the advantage of preventing the accumulation of toxic metabolites through the lowering of mevalonate levels.2,3

The reasoning behind the use of topical cholesterol/statin formulations for porokeratosis is linked to the favorable outcomes observed in CHILD syndrome (congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and leg defects), where it is thought that skin lesions may result from the accumulation of toxic metabolites from the cholesterol pathway due to mutations in the NSDHL gene [Xq28], which codes for a protein involved in cholesterol biosynthesis.4

Case reports and series published since 2019 have reported favorable results for the use of topical cholesterol combined with either simvastatin or lovastatin in patients with porokeratosis (Table 1). The advantages of these formulations are their price, versatility (vehicles can be changed or adjuvants such as keratolytics added), and dosage (which can be maintained indefinitely).3,5 Although these novel formulations are being increasingly used in routine clinical practice, many cases are not reported. We believe it important to summarize the experience to date to consolidate existing knowledge and inform subsequent use.

Table 1.

Summary of Case Reports and Series Describing the Use of Topical Statin and Cholesterol Formulations in Porokeratosis.

Type of porokeratosis  Authors  No. of patients  Study design  Formulation  Time to evaluation of response  Dosage  Results 
LP (2 patients)PPPD (2 patients)DSAP (1 patient)  Atzmony et al., 2019  Cases series  2% cholesterol/2% lovastatin  4 and 5 wk6 and 8 wk4 wk  Twice daily  The 2 patients with LP experienced a decrease in lesion thickness and erythema (the improvement was less evident in 1 patient).The 2 patients with PPPD experienced a considerable decrease in scaling and a moderate decrease in erythema.The patient with PSAD experienced a marked decrease in erythema, scaling, and lesion number. 
DSAP  Maronese et al., 2020  Case report  2% cholesterol/2% lovastatin  8 wk  Once daily  Decrease in lesion number, erythema, and scaling 
DSAP  Jerjen et al., 2020  Case report  2% cholesterol/2% simvastatin  12 wk  Twice daily  Decrease in lesion number, erythema, and scaling 
LP  Blue et al., 2020  Case report  2% cholesterol/2% lovastatin  8 wk  Twice daily  Complete response after treatment 
LP  Saleva-Stateva et al., 2021  Case series  2% simvastatin/5% colesterol  4 wk  Twice daily  Treatment was withdrawn in 2 patients (40%) who showed no improvement. After showing mild improvement, 1 patient received a higher dose of simvastatin (5%) and showed further improvement. The other 2 patients (40%) experienced a mild decrease in lesion thickness; 1 of them also experienced a mild improvement in erythema. 
DSAP  Byth et al., 2021  Case series  2% cholesterol/2% simvastatin  6 wk  Twice daily  One patient discontinued treatment after 2 wk due to the presence of large atrophic lesions against a background of atopic dermatitis.The other 7 patients (87.5%) experienced a decrease in scaling, erythema (to a lesser degree), and lesion number. 
DSAP  Tomsitz et al., 2022  Case series  2% cholesterol/2% lovastatin  12 wk  Twice daily  Two of the 7 patients (28%) achieved a complete response; the others (72%) experienced noticeable improvement according to the PGA. 

Abbreviations: LP, linear porokeratosis; PGA, Physician's Global Assessment; PPPD, porokeratosis palmaris et plantaris disseminata; DSAP, disseminated superficial actinic keratosis.

Funding

No funding was received.

References
[1]
P. Vargas-Mora, D. Morgado-Carrasco, X. Fustà-Novell.
Poroqueratosis. Revisión de su etiopatogenia, manifestaciones clínicas, diagnóstico y tratamiento.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, (2020), pp. 111
[2]
L. Atzmony, H.M. Khan, Y.H. Lim, A.S. Paller, J.L. Levinsohn, K.E. Holland, et al.
Second-hit, Postzygotic PMVK and MVD mutations in linear porokeratosis.
[3]
L. Atzmony, Y.H. Lim, C. Hamilton, J.S. Leventhal, A. Wagner, A.S. Paller, et al.
Topical cholesterol/lovastatin for the treatment of porokeratosis: a pathogenesis-directed therapy.
J Am Acad Dermatol, (2020), pp. 82
[4]
C. Bergqvist, B. Abdallah, D.J. Hasbani, O. Abbas, A.G. Kibbi, L. Hamie, et al.
CHILD syndrome: a modified pathogenesis-targeted therapeutic approach.
Am J Med Genet Part A, (2018), pp. 176
[5]
D. Tomsitz, T. Biedermann.
Successful treatment of disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis with topical 2% cholesterol/2% lovastatin cream: a case series with 7 patients.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, (2022), pp. 36
Copyright © 2023. AEDV
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?